• twitter-icon

Search results for: itat

ITAT's Order In Case of Kanjula Rajagopal Reddy Firm VS Income Tax Officer

Vishakhapatnam ITAT: Assessee Can Claim ITC for TCS Paid Even When No TDS Shortfall Exists U/S 194Q

Visakhapatnam ITAT on finding that there is no shortfall of TDS and the taxpayer is eligible to obtain credit of the entire amount, rendered the AO to allot the credit of the whole amount deducted as tax at source under section 194Q of the Income Tax Act. The Bench of Duvvuru Rl Reddy (Judicial Member) […]

Delhi ITAT's Order In the Case of Sandeep Hooda Vs DCIT

ITAT Delhi: No Tax Deduction Permits U/S 54 Without Basic Facilities

In DCIT vs. Sandeep Hooda, adjudicated by ITAT Delhi, the taxpayer’s eligibility for deduction u/s 54 of the I-T Act, 1961, is scrutinized. The dispute emerges from the absence of essential amenities in the claimed residential property. The case background is that the taxpayer, Sandeep Hooda, qualifies for tax deduction u/s 54 despite the shortage […]

Rajkot ITAT's Order In Case of Maruti Enterprise Vs The ADIT

Rajkot ITAT: Tax Deduction U/S 43B Can Be Permitted When Assessee Claims on Payment Basis

No rejection should be there for the taxpayer’s claim since the same was not notified in the tax audit report, certainly in the cases where the other proof is available on record recommending the deduction as per the provisions of section 43B on a payment basis is available, Rajkot ITAT ruled. The Bench of the […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In Case of Jignesh Chimanlal Jobanputra vs ITO

ITAT Mumbai: IT Addition Can’t Be Deleted Solely Due to Erroneous Section Mention

The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the addition could not be deleted for the only cause that the section under which the addition is made is cited incorrectly and that it is essential to look into the merits of the case. The bench of Anikesh Banerjee (Judicial Member) and Padmavathy […]

Surat ITAT's Order in the Case of ACIT Vs Shanker Nebhumal Uttamchandani

ITAT Surat: WhatsApp Pics Alone Don’t Prove Income Without Verification

The matter of ACIT Vs Shanker Nebhumal Uttamchandani, as decided by ITAT Surat, emphasizes the importance of substantial proof in tax assessments, especially concerning additions incurred based on digital device data. The Assessing Officer (AO) had incurred the additions to the taxpayer’s income based on particulars discovered in the digital device at the time of […]

Delhi ITAT's Order In Case of Satya Kiran Healthcare Private Ltd. Verses ITO

TDS Deductions Not Evaluated on Payments to Medical Machine Maintenance: ITAT Delhi Orders Fresh Adjudication

A reconsideration is been ordered by the Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) asking for a new adjudication. The same decision arrives as the submissions for the Tax Deducted at Source ( TDS ) deductions u/s 194J or 194C for payments related to X-ray and CVC machine maintenance were not regarded. The […]

Delhi ITAT's Order In the Case of Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs ACIT

ITAT Delhi Permits to Claim Bad Debts U/S 36(1)(vii) By Oriental Bank of Commerce

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi’s recent decision in the matter of Oriental Bank of Commerce vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) has influential implications for the treatment of bad debts claimed by the bank u/s 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petition related to the AY 2017-18 and was filed against the order of […]

Delhi ITAT's Order In Case of Bijender Singh Lohia Versus JCIT (OSD)

Delhi ITAT: Entries in a Manual Cash Book for Cash Withdrawals are Not Sufficient for Tax Additions

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that the manual cash book that comprises entries pertinent to the cash withdrawals and expenses of the company, which were duly recorded and reconciled with its books of account, including with the cash introduced, withdrawn, and expenses on behalf of the taxpayer. The bench of Anubhav […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In Case of Shri Ajit Chandrashekar Dighe Vs DCIT

ITAT Mumbai: Form 16 or 26 AS Important for Claiming TDS Credit

The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) demanded re-adjudication, commenting that either Form 26AS or Form 16 is crucial to claim the Tax Deducted at Source ( TDS ) credit. The taxpayer claimed TDS amounting to Rs.10,45,439 was deducted by the employer i.e. M/s. Nirmal Lifestyle Ltd. from salary u/s […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software