• twitter-icon

Search results for: Income Tax Act

New Handbook on Legal Matters by the Income Tax Department

CBDT Releases Judicial Matters Handbook for Departmental Use Only

A detailed guide for tax professionals and departmental officers is been proposed by the recently updated Handbook on Judicial Matters, prepared by the Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Judicial). The book specifies the process to file the appeals in distinct judicial fora, including the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), High Court, and […]

Gujarat HC's Order In Case of Amee Mahasukhlal Parekh as Lr of Late Mahasukhlal Navnidhlal Parekh vs. ITO

Gujarat HC: IT Section 68 Does Not Apply if There is No Clear Declaration of Amount in the Bank Statement

It was mentioned by the Gujarat High Court that there cannot be any income escapement from the taxpayer if there is no unexplained amount in the bank statement on record. The Bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Mauna M. Bhatt noted that “the reason given by the Assessing Officer for alleged escapement of Rs.3,25,00,000/- […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in the Case of Bhartiya Samruddhi Investments and Consulting Services Limited Vs. ACIT

Delhi ITAT Quashes Reassessment, Rules Section 147 Cannot Be Invoked for Mere Change of Opinion

The reassessment of the assessee has been quashed by the Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), which held that an assessment u/s 147 of the I-T Act,1961 cannot be reopened based on mere modification of opinion. Bhartiya Samruddhi Investments and Consulting Services Limited, the appellant-assessee, asserted ₹91,47,928 as ‘sundry advances/assets written […]

Cuttack ITAT's Order In the Case of ARSS Developers Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Cuttack ITAT Upholds Decision of CIT(A) to Eliminate ₹3.08 Crore Penalty for AY 2014–15 U/S 271(1)(c)

The Cuttack Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) carried the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) to remove the Rs.3,08,11,278 penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year 2014-15 since the underlying quantum addition no more existed. An appeal has been filed by the revenue against the CIT(A), order on 25.6.2024, which removes the […]

Centre Eases the TDS Deposit Rules on Employees' Salaries

Center Gives Extra Time to Employers for Deducting TDS on Salaries

The centre in relief to the employers simplified the limitations to the companies for depositing the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on salaries of the employee. Starting from October 1, 2024, the employers will have additional time to deduct Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) from their employees’ salaries. An additional time is been provided to […]

CBDT Raises Threshold Filing Appeals via Circular No. 9/2024

CBDT Cir No. 9/2024: Enhancement of Monetary Limits for Filing Appeals

CBDT Circular No. 09/2024-Income Tax Dated: 17/09/2024: Enhancement of Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before ITAT, High Courts, and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court. Introduction of CBDT Circular No. 9/2024 A series of circulars have been issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on distinct occasions that are binding on […]

Delhi HC's Order in the Case of Hari Kishan Sharma Vs. Govt of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC: IT Dept Cannot Deny Refund Due to Missing TDS Details in Form 26AS

The Delhi High Court in a judgment ruled that the income tax department could not refuse the refund claim of the assessee as the Tax Deducted at Source TDS is not shown in Form 26AS. The order of the department has been quashed by the court rejecting the application of the assessee to file an […]

Madras HC's Order in Case of Manjula Jaganathan Hariprasad Vs. The Assessment Unit & Income Tax Officer

Madras HC Deletes Addition Due to Incorrect Deduction U/S 194-IB Instead of 194C

The Madras High Court quashed the income tax addition as a wrongful deduction u/s 194-IB rather than Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Three additions have been offered by the respondents to the income shown, however, the additions were dismissed without enough reasoning. The assessment proceedings started following the applicant’s ITR filing for […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order in Case of J. K. Global Vs. Income Tax Officer

Mumbai ITAT Rules Unsecured Loans as Unaccounted Money, Orders Addition U/S 68

Discovering that the loans were nothing, however, the accommodation entries along with the repayment are indeed nothing only the return of accommodation entries, the Mumbai ITAT ruled that the money has been drawn in getting the unsecured loan is nothing but the unaccounted money of the taxpayer and is to be added under section 68. […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software