• twitter-icon

Search results for: income tax department

Karnataka HC's Order in Case of Sithappana Halli Bychappa Padmanabha Gowda Vs. ITO

Karnataka HC Dismisses Tax Assessment Cases U/S 148A(b) for Failure to Serve Show-Cause Notice

The Karnataka High Court in a ruling has quashed the income tax assessment proceedings u/s 148A (b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as of the non-service of the show-cause notice. The applicant Sithappana Halli Bychappa Padmanabha Gowda contested the validity of distinct notices and orders issued via the income tax department specifically the notice […]

Bangalore ITAT's Order In the Case of the Sekhon Jagtar Singh Vs ITO

Bangalore ITAT Cancels Tax Penalty U/S 270 Due to Misunderstanding of Non-filing of ITR

The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in a case quashed a tax penalty imposed u/s 270 of the Income Tax Act 1961, remarking that the taxpayer failed to file a Return due to a bona fide misunderstanding. The taxpayer Sekhon Jagtar Singh, in this case, is an individual who […]

Gujarat HC's Order in Case of V M Procon PVT. LTD Vs. Assistant Director of IT

Gujarat HC: Delayed Filing of 10-IC Form Won’t Affect Reduced Tax Rate if Conditions of Section 115BAA Are Met

Witnessing that the taxpayer has fulfilled the conditions to lessen the tax rate under section 115BAA, the Gujarat High Court cited that the revenue department would required to condone delay in the filing of Form 10-IC instead of rejecting it on technical grounds. Section 115BAA of the Income Tax Act permits domestic companies to use […]

Non-Linked PAN with Aadhaar Trigger Tax Demands from Firms

Unlinked PAN with Aadhaar Result in High Tax Demands, Putting Firms in a Difficult Position

Numerous employers are facing difficulties due to Income Tax Department notices demanding unpaid taxes from employees who did not meet the May 31 deadline to connect their PAN and Aadhaar numbers, with some companies receiving tax demands for employees earning below the taxable income limit. This April the revenue department mentioned that PANs will become […]

CBDT Resends 10,000 Notices to Stop Tax Evasion

New Fear for Companies, CBDT Seeks Explanation for Major Discrepancies in Their Reported Incomes

The income tax department has furnished 10,000 reopening notices to the companies and individuals in major cities asking for explanations for the differences in their notified incomes. Alongside the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) current directive to track rampant cash transactions in sectors like hotels, luxury brand sales, hospitals, and IVF clinics, suggesting the […]

Delhi Hc's Order in Case of Shree Bhavani Power Project Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Office

Delhi HC: Tax Deduction U/S 80-Ia(7) Can’t Be Rejected Due to Not Filed Audit Report Digitally

The Delhi High Court, the deduction u/s 80-IA(7) of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied for the mere failure of the taxpayer to digitally file an audit report. It was noted by the bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Ravinder Dudeja that the audit report was duly provided to the AO and was […]

Bombay HC's Order in Case of Hemant Mahipatray Shah Vs Anand Upadhyay

Bombay HC Sets Aside Tax Notice Against Director as TDS Already Deposited with Interest

The issuance of the process has been quashed by the Bombay High Court which is served on the directors of the company, M/s. Hubtown Ltd., for offences punishable u/s 276B and 278B of the Income Tax Act for the delay in depositing the TDS as the TDS deducted by the company had already been deposited […]

Summary of New Changes Under IT Section 148A

Quick Guide to Income Tax Section 148A with New Changes

The Finance Bill 2024 includes changes to Section 148A of the Income-Tax (I-T) Act, which relates to the time limits for issuing notices to reopen assessments. Currently, the Income-Tax Department can reopen assessments under Section 148A for up to 5 years and 3 Months from the end of the relevant assessment year if the income […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order In Case of Swaminarayan Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs The ACIT

Ahmedabad ITAT: AO Failed to Specify Tax Penalty u/s 274 and 271(1)(c)

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the AO failed to specify whether the penalty was for concealment or inaccurate particulars in the notice issued under Section 274 and Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The bench of Suchitra Kamble (Judicial Member) and Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member) has […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2025

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software