• twitter-icon

Search results for: Income tax Act

P&H HC's Order in Case of The land Acquisition Officer, Urban Estate Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

P&H HC Quashes ₹128 Cr Fine Imposed on LAO for Failure to Deduct TDS from Interest on Increased Compensation

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has set aside the hefty penalty of Rs.128 Crores levied on the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) for failing to deduct Tax Deduction At Source (TDS) on the interest on the surged compensation disbursed under the Land Acquisition Act. It was remarked by the court that the officer followed the […]

Delhi ITAT's Order In Case of Nord Anglia Education Ltd. Vs DCIT

Delhi ITAT: Routine Support Services Can’t Be Classified as FTS Under India-UK DTAA

The Delhi bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in a case stated that routine support services are not to be categorized under “Fee for Technical Services” (FTS) under the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), and therefore are not accountable to taxation in India. Nord Anglia Education Ltd, the assessee/appellant is an […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order In the Case of Radha Mohan Education Charitable Trust Vs ITO

Ahmedabad ITAT Cancels Order U/S 144 for Sending IT Notices to Incorrect Address

An order passed under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ITA), noting that income tax notices were not sent to the actual address of the assessee has been set aside by the Ahmedabad “A” Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). A notice on 08.03.2018 under section 142(1) of ITA was issued to […]

Kerala HC's Order in the Case of Mary Queens Mission Hospital Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Kerala HC: Delay Condonation Applications Should Be Judicious, Not Hyper-Technical

The applications for condonation of delay should have been regarded without being too hyper-technical and in a judicious manner, ruled by the Kerala High Court. It was noted by the bench of Justice Gopinath P. that the delay in audit report filing in Form-10B can be 30 days, as the law merely needs that the […]

Calcutta HC's Order In Case of West Bengal Welfare Society Vs CIT

Calcutta HC Upholds ITAT’s Order, Ruling Assessee Eligible for Reg. Within Six Months U/S 80G(5)(iii)

In its recent decision, the Calcutta High Court upheld a ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) allowing an assessee to seek registration under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 after the initiation of the activity. The revenue department filed a petition under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, disputing […]

Bombay HC's Order in Case of Kairos Properties Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Bombay HC Quashes Jurisdictional AO’s Exercise U/S 148A Conducted Outside Faceless Mechanism

Observing that the scheme shown by the Central Government does not envisage exclusion of provision of section 148A since the process shown within the mentioned provisions is inextricably associated with Section 148, the Bombay High Court has quashed the whole exercise that the jurisdiction AO has performed under section 148A outside the faceless procedure. Section […]

Cuttack ITAT's Order in Case of M/s Harichandanpur LAMPS Vs ITO

Cuttack ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) for Reassessment of Non-Compliance and Evaluation of Evidence

The Cuttack bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in a case has remanded the petition via the taxpayer against the commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) order after condoning a 69-day delay. It was remarked by the tribunal that the non-compliance and the absence of documentation in the order of the CIT (Appeals) furnished […]

Bombay HC's Order in the Case of Benaifer Vispi Patel Vs. The Income Tax Officer

Bombay HC: AO Must Verify the Accuracy of Information Before Initiating a Reassessment

The Bombay High Court has determined that Assessing Officers (AOs) must verify information before initiating reassessment proceedings based on faceless data. This ruling comes from a bench of Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Somasekhar Sundaresan, who underscored the importance of verification when AOs intend to act under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, particularly when […]

Punjab & Haryana HC's Order In The Case Of Harjot Singh V/S Principal Commissioner Income Tax-Central

Assessing Officer Mistakenly Issued Assessment: Punjab and Haryana High Court Validates Revision Order

The Punjab & Haryana High Court upheld the revisional order passed by the Principal Commissioner Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. as the assessment was wrongly passed by the Assessing Officer ( AO ) under Section 44ADA of the Act. The taxpayer Harjot Singh, is an individual who filed his […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software