• twitter-icon

Search results for: income tax department

Allahabad HC's Order in The Case of M/S Vimlesh Kumar Contractor vs. State of U.P. and 3 others

Allahabad HC: No GST Can Be Levied on Paid Post-GST Payments for VAT-Era Works

A significant ruling by the Allahabad High Court has clarified that GST authorities do not have the power to initiate proceedings under Section 73 to levy tax on payments received post-GST if the work was actually completed during the VAT regime. The Context: In this specific case, the petitioner, who works under a work contract, […]

Effortlessly Generate Multiple Reports Using TDS Software

How TDS Software Generates Multiple Reports for Clients

Tax Deducted at Source, or TDS, is a crucial requirement for employers and businesses in India. It is the method by which taxes are collected when people earn money, ensuring that the government receives its share within a specified time. Manual tracking of TDS is time-consuming and requires a significant amount of effort. It is […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in The Case of Krishna Gopal Saraf vs The A.C.I.T

ITAT: Presumption U/S 292C Regarding Documents Found During Search is Rebuttable, Not Conclusive

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”) ruled that the presumption u/s 292C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the ownership and truth of documents discovered in search, is rebuttable and is not conclusive in specifying undisclosed income. The taxpayer, Krishna Gopal Saraf, a salaried employee of Sarthak Vanijya India Ltd (SVIL), […]

Jaipur ITAT's Order in The Case of Chandra Prakash Vashistha vs. The ITO

SBI Employee Wins: ITAT Confirms Retrospective ₹25 Lakh Leave Encashment Exemption

The Jaipur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) permitted an appeal filed by a retired State Bank of India employee, carrying that the revised Rs 25 lakh exemption limit for leave encashment u/s 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act,1961, applied retrospectively as notified by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). The taxpayer, Chandra […]

Jaipur ITAT's Order In Case of Samarth Lifestyle Retailing Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT

Jaipur ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹2.16 Crore Citing Audited Books and TDS Mismatch with Form 26AS

The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) validated the deletion of an addition of ₹2,16,27,822 made u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to a mismatch between the commission and other income reported in the books and the figures specified in Form 26AS. The taxpayer, Samarth Lifestyle Retailing Pvt. Ltd., […]

Bombay HC's Order in The Case of Balaji Landmarks LLP Eartwhile vs. Central Board Of Direct Taxes (CBDT)

Bombay HC: Delay in Filing ITR Due to CAs Advice Does Not Constitute Assessee’s Negligence

The Bombay High Court has determined that an assessee should not face penalties for delays in the submission of their tax return attributable to the late guidance provided by their chartered accountant. The bench mentioned that the delay is not because of any negligence on the taxpayer’s end but due to insufficient suggestions via the […]

P&H HC Warns CBDT Over ITR Audit Deadline Delay

P&H High Court Warns CBDT: Extend ITR Audit Deadline or Face Contempt

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has given a warning to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) for not following the order of the High Court on October 13, 2025, which asked for an extension of the income tax return (ITR) filing due date for audited cases. The court said that the continued inaction […]

Madras HC's Order In Case of M/s Sritharani Infraa Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Tax Recovery Officer and Others

Madras HC Directs IT Recovery Officer to Release Property Attachment Post Final Acquisition

The Madras High Court ruled that an Income Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) must lift attachment orders on a taxpayer’s property once the subject-matter issue has attained finality at the appellate level. The High Court’s decision against a writ petition filed by M/s Sritharani Infraa Developers Pvt. Ltd., impugning an attachment order dated July 15, 2022, […]

Allahabad HC's Order in The Case of Mahesh Gautam vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Allahabad HC: I-T Notices U/S 148 Must Be Personally Served via Speed Post for Valid Service U/S 27

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that notices issued under Sections 148 and 282 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, must be personally served on the assessee through speed post. Simply sending the notice to the assessee’s address does not satisfy the requirement of valid service under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates