• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Delhi ITAT: Cash Found At The Time Of Search Can Be Explained By The Availability Of Cash With Different Companies

Delhi ITAT's Order for M/s Creamy Foods Ltd

Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the cash availability with distinct firms is enough to elaborate on the cash revealed at the time of the investigation.

The assessing officer assessed the 9 group references and firms as well as accepted the in-hand cash availability in the respective books of accounts, the bench of Astha Chandra (Judicial Member) and N.K. Billaiya (Accountant Member) observed.

Hence, sending the matter back to the Assessing Officer for cash verification, already examined during the assessment order, would be pointless. During the search and seizure operation, Rs. 2,65,31,500 in cash was discovered at New Delhi premises, including the Noida Office and its plant. Of this, Rs. 2,09,99,150 was seized.

The assessee was questioned about this cash. Despite the statement from the accountant, Shri Pradeep Mishra, no satisfactory explanation or reconciliation with the cashbook was provided. Consequently, the Assessing Officer had to consider the Rs. 2,65,31,500 as unexplained income, adding it under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act.

In their appeal to the CIT (A), the assessee clarified that the cash discovered belonged to various companies or entities within the SMC Group, and this cash was duly recorded in the cash books of those entities. The CIT(A) believed that other businesses were operating from the same location, with cash balances not considered during the addition at the time of the search.

The department argued that the assessee only provided cash statements from group companies and individuals to the CIT(A), who accepted these without seeking a report from the Assessing Officer. Verification of these documents is necessary, suggesting the issue be sent back to the assessing officer.

However, the tribunal saw no need to recheck facts already verified by the assessing officer, deeming it unnecessary and illogical to remand the matter for further verification.

Case TitleM/s Creamy Foods Ltd Vs The Dy. C.I.T
CitationITA No. 1911/DEL/2022 [A.Y. 2018-19]
Date06.12.2023
Counsel For AppellantShri Salil Aggarwal, Shri Shailesh Gupta, Shri Madhur Aggarwal
Counsel For RespondentShri T. James Singson
Delhi ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software