• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


MCA Imposes ₹2.5 Lakh Penalty on Company & Director for Not Appointing Internal Auditor

Bangalore-ROC-Adjudication-Order-for-Exotel-Techcom-Private-Limited

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has fined a private limited company and its director ₹2.5 lakh because they failed to appoint an Internal Auditor, which is a requirement for businesses to ensure proper financial management.

In accordance with Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013, and as stipulated in Rule 13(1)(c) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, companies are mandated to appoint an Internal Auditor. Failure to adhere to this requirement can result in financial penalties, underscoring the importance of compliance with statutory obligations in corporate governance.

According to the order dated 08.12.2025, the ROC held that since Exotel Techcom Private Limited’s (i.e., the Company’s) turnover crossed the defined threshold, it was directed to appoint an internal auditor from FY 2022-23 onwards; however, the appointment was made only on 14.11.2024.

Recommended: How ROC Software Solves Key Challenges in Annual Audits

The registrar reported a persistent default lasting 958 days.

From the order, the company itself submitted a suo-motu application dated 09.01.2025, considering the lapse. It mentioned that it had not appointed an internalauditor for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24, even though such an appointment was compulsory.

Thereafter, the ROC issued an SCN, after the hearing dated 20.08.2025, which was attended by the authorised representative of the company. Information on additional turnover was filed via the practising company secretary dated 25.08.2025 as directed during the hearing.

The submissions were analysed by ROC. It concluded that the turnover of the company had surpassed Rs 200 crore in FY 2021-22. The same makes the company obligatory to appoint an internal auditor from FY 2022-23.

Read Also: Penalty Charges for Non-compliance with Filing MCA Forms

With the appointment of the auditor post time period, the registrar held the company and its officer in default, obligated for a penalty for the period 01.04.2022 to 14.11.2024 (958 days).

Hence, it charged a penalty of Rs 2 lakhs on the company and Rs 50,000 on its director.

Read ROC Bangalore Official Order ID PO/ADJ/12-2025/BL/01076

Company NameExotel Techcom Private Limited
Total PenaltyINR 2.50 Lakh
Order IDPO/ADJ/12-2025/BL/01076
ROC BangaloreRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Tax Offer 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Gen Complaw Software