• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras High Court Quashes GST Demand Order U/S 74 for Lack of Independent Reasoning

Madras HC's Order In Case of Tvl Skp Readymix vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

The Madras High Court has withdrawn a demand order related to the GST Act, 2017. The court discovered that the order just repeated the assessee’s answer without offering its investigation or argument. This lack of separate evaluation was a key basis for the court’s judgment to set aside the order.

Tvl. SKP Readymix has furnished a writ petition contesting the demand order on 13.03.2025, which arose from allegations of (1) excess claim of GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) because of the mismatch between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B, (2) underreporting of outward supplies, and (3) availment of blocked credit u/s 17(5) of the GST Act.

Towards the third issue, the applicant considered the obligation and has made the partial payments and furnished the documents for the remaining issues.

Justice C. Saravanan, while analysing the impugned order, said that the response of the applicant and the furnished submission in the personal hearing have been extracted in full, on the values of the raised problems, the adjudicating authority does not provide any appropriate discussion or reasoning.

Read Also: GST Section 74A to Address Tax Discrepancies & Incorrect ITC

The order concluded that the applicant did not file the supporting documents and therefore validated the demand without analysing the submitted proof.

Court, if the authority uses its mind, then this application should be shown via a reasoned and speaking order. An order is non-sustainable in law, as the response of the taxpayer is only a reproduction without substantive analysis.

The impugned order has been set aside by the High Court, and the case has been sent back to the respondent authority for fresh adjudication with the particular directives to pass a detailed order with effective discussion on the second and third problems.

A proper hearing should be given and permission to file all the related documents, the court cited. Within 3 months from the receipt of the order of the court, the fresh order is to be passed.

Case TitleTvl Skp Readymix vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Case No.W.P(MD)No.16052 of 2025
For PetitionerMr.B.Rooban
For RespondentMr.R.Sureshkumar
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Powering India’s Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates