• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC Orders GSTAT to Review Appeal on Excellence as Delayed Due to Illness

Madras HC's Order for Great Heights Developers LLP

The Madras High Court directed the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Authority to regard a GST petition on merits, following the appellant’s illness, which resulted in a delay of 144 days, beyond the condonable delay of 120 days.

The petitioner contested the order insofar as the levy of penalty and interest under Section 73(9) and Section 73(7) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ( the CGST Act ) are concerned.

According to the show cause notice the applicant mentioned that the impugned assessment order was issued dated 14.08.2023. Such an order was obtained through the petitioner on 16.08.2023. As per that, the appeal should have been filed within 90 days thereof.

For the applicant, N.Murali appeared and Rajinish Pathiyil, Sr. SC appeared for the respondents.

Read Also: Kerala HC Directs Govt to Open GSTN Portal for Filing GST Return, Order from GSTAT

The petition can not get furnished within the time specified on the applicant’s end being verified with the septic shock and based on the issues in complying with the consultant. Consequently, it was mentioned that the time limits to file a petition with an application to condone delay gets lapsed dated 16.12.2023.

Single Bench of the Madras High Court observed that “Under Section 107 of the CGST Act, the Appellate Authority does not have the power to condone delay beyond 120 days. In this case, the period of further delay is only 24 days and the petitioner has provided cogent reasons to explain such delay. It is pertinent to note that the petitioner has paid the entire tax liability and the proposed appeal is limited to penalty and interest.”

On merits, if the appeal is obtained within a maximum time of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order the Appellate Authority is directed to receive and dispose of the appeal.

Case TitleGreat Heights Developers LLP Vs Additional Commissioner Office of the Commissioner
Case No.W.P.No.1324 of 2024
Date01.02.2024
For the PetitionerMr.N.Murali
For the StateMr.Rajinish Pathiyil
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates