• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC Orders Officials to Sanction Retrospective GST Registration for Petitioner

Madras High court directed the Joint Commissioner & Assistant Commissioner to allow retrospective enrollment for the Registration Certificate of the applicant.

The applicant is the owner of Tvl. Lourdes Matha Cashew Industries provides a provisional Registration Certificate beneath the Goods and services act through the respondent authority. As per him, he decided to transfer from the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax administration to the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax administration.

Retrospective GST Registration for Petitioner Certificate

But he is not able to upload the information as needed to migrate and thus no finalization process is there. He found that some of the mistakes were done by the mistakes of the department of Tamil Nadu and some because of the computer system.

As per him, he has given a letter to the respondent authority that points out the issues which are seen by him with respect to the migration from Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax administration to the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax administration.

Although as per him there is no response in favor of the petitioner from the department. The provisional certificate given to him had expired and thus he was obliged to apply for the new application for enrollment. under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act a new application was in process and a valid enrollment certificate was been given by the respondent authority.

When the petition was filed then the new GST registration Get to know the complete GST registration procedure online on the Indian government GST portal official website. We have explained by the actual screenshot of every step. Read more was obtained and no old registration came into effect when the applicant submitted his returns.

Justice Abdul Quddhose sees that the applicant is liable to get relief as his representation is simultaneous, it is to be considered on merits as per the law.

Thus the court held that the respondent authority should seek the appeal about the valid registration from July 1, 2017, and pass an order as per the law and the decision referred by the applicant in his representation post giving enough opportunity to the applicant in a period of 8 weeks.

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates