• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of GSTR-9 Annual Return

Madras HC's Order In the Case of Tvl. KPK Fuel Services Vs State Tax Officer

The Madras High Court has maintained the charge of late fee and penalty on a GST-registered taxpayer for failure to submit the annual return in Form GSTR-9, holding that Section 47(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, allows such charges for continued non-compliance.

The case has arisen from a writ petition contesting an order dated 13 December 2023 passed u/s 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017. The tax authorities had levied a late fee and penalty for not submitting the annual return for FY 2017-18.

The applicant stated that the charge was not legal, citing that the deadline for submitting the GSTR-9 return had been extended and that the late fee is applicable for late filing rather than non-filing. It was claimed that once a late fee is charged, a separate penalty u/s 125 cannot be imposed for the same default.

The High Court denied such claims. It affirmed that Section 47(2) includes the situations where a registered person did not submit the annual return by the deadline and does not limit the late fee to cases of late filing. Hence, Rs 100 per day will be charged for non-filing, subject to the statutory cap.

The Court, concerning the penalty issue, noted that Section 125 of the GST law provides for a general penalty of up to ₹25,000 where no particular penalty is mentioned. Invocation of Section 125 was valid as no separate penalty provisions for failure to submit GSTR-9 are there.

The Court said that the tax authorities were justified in levying a late fee u/s 47(2) and a penalty u/s 125, as they function in different legal fields.

Important: How to File GSTR 9C Annual Audit Form via Gen GST Software

Subsequently, the HC said that no illegality exists in the impugned order. Also, refused to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ petition was dismissed, hence keeping the demand of the late fee and penalty against the taxpayer.

Case TitleTvl. KPK Fuel Services Vs State Tax Officer
Case No.WP No. 17421 of 2026
For the PetitionerMr Raghunandan Sriram
For the RespondentMs Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Tax Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Offer in 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates