• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Kolkata ITAT Condones More Than 800-Day Delay After Consultant’s Death During COVID-19

Kolkata ITAT's Order in The Case of Subodh Adhikary vs. ITO

The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), in a ruling, adopted a compassionate approach in condoning a delay of 848 days in filing an appeal, after the appellant’s Income Tax Consultant tragically passed away during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The assessment order for AY 2015-16 has been contested by the applicant, Subodh Adhikary, in which the AO had made distinct additions apart from the issue of the cash deposits that was originally flagged under CASS. AO had expanded the investigation into capital gains, unexplained investments, and property transactions before formally converting the case into a complete scrutiny.

The counsel of the applicant said that the action of the AO breached the CBDT Instruction No. 5/2016, which restricts investigation in limited scrutiny cases unless credible material is available and proper approval is received. He relied on earlier decisions, including Dev Milk Foods Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi ITAT) and Vijay Kumar (Chandigarh ITAT), which had taken an identical view.

The counsel of the department said that the AO has issued notice u/s 142(1) and thereafter converted the matter to complete scrutiny dated December 1, 2017, thereby explaining the additions.

The Division Bench of Shri Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member) and Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey (Judicial Member) cited that the AO had initiated an investigation into other problems before the conversion order was passed. The Tribunal determined that this action was against the CBDT’s binding instructions and constituted a fishing and roving inquiry. It also observed that the approval for conversion was mechanical and did not have concrete evidence.

The Tribunal had set aside the assessment order, removing all additions which consist of short-term capital gains of Rs 2.26 crore, unexplained investment of ₹2.84 crore, and the cash credit of ₹28 lakh. The appeal was permitted.

Case TitleSubodh Adhikary vs ITO
Case No.I.T.A. No.669/Kol/2024
For PetitionerSomnath Ghosh, Advocate
For RespondentP.N. Barnwal, CIT, DR
Kolkata ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Tax Offer 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software