• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT: Medical Certificate is Valid Proof for Condoning Assessee’s Delay in Filing Tax Audit Reports

Bangalore ITAT's Order In the Case of Home of Peoples Empowerment Foundation vs. ITO

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore in a case where the appeal of the taxpayer was permitted by considering the Medical Certificate as adequate evidence for condonation of taxpayer’s filing delay of the audit report.

The appellant Home of Peoples Empowerment Foundation has submitted an appeal against the impugned order of the income tax officer. The problem with the ITAT was that if the CIT(A) was true in law in dismissing the taxpayer’s appeal without condoning the delay of 205 days.

Read Also: Delhi HC: Two Judgment Orders Against One SCN Cannot Be Accepted for the Same Period

Advocate Arun Bhatt the counsel of the taxpayer has said that the delay has arrived because of the illness of the trustee who was asked for 2 to 3 months rest by the doctors. In discarding the submissions of the taxpayer’s condonation of delay, CIT(A) was incorrect.

The counsel of the taxpayer has furnished a medical certificate and indeed the advantage of sections 11 and 12 were refused to the taxpayer. The ITAT bench Accountant Member Waseem Ahmed and Judicial Member Prakash Chand Yadav marked that given the medical certificate document, CIT(A) must have condoned the delay of 205 days.

Benefits under sections 11 & 12 were refused by the assessee as the assessee failed to annex Form No.10B. U/s 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act the taxpayer has submitted a petition to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) asking for the condonation of delay in submitting Form No.10B.

The CBDT has condoned the delay in filing Form No. 10B and asked the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) to regard the taxpayer’s claim. The board asked the Assessing Officer to analyze the taxpayer’s claim under the norms of CBDT. Therefore the plea of the taxpayer was permitted.

Case TitleHome of Peoples Empowerment Foundation vs. ITO
CitationITA No.1525/Bang/2024
Date04.11.2024
Appellant byMs. Aruna Bhatt
Respondent byShri Ganesh R. Ghale
ITAT BangaloreRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software