• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Delhi ITAT Cancels Assessment Order for AY10 Due to Jurisdictional Error Under Section 153C

Delhi ITAT's Order In the Case of Kamal Sharma vs. DCIT

The assessment for Assessment Year(AY) 2009-10 has been set aside by the Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) as of the jurisdictional error u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act,1961.

The petitioner/taxpayer Kamal Sharma, has contested the plea against the order on 27.02.2023 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)] for the AY 2009-10.

It was cited by the taxpayers’ counsel that a search has been undertaken in the matter of Sunstar Group dated 19.12.2013 and a notice under section 153C was furnished dated 20.01.2016 founded on the discovered materials. He said that the considered search for the objective of section 153C was for AY 2016-17.

U/s 153C the notices were furnished for the 6 assessment years before the search year, wrapping AYs 2010-11 to 2015-16. As the assessment for AY 2009-10 was lapsed, the counsel claimed that it was beyond jurisdiction, quoting distinct ITAT decisions to support the claim.

Section 153C of the Act permits the Assessing Officer (AO) to furnish a notice for the assessment of a person (other than the one investigated) if the materials pertinent to them are discovered in a search. Before the search year, the notice can cover up to 6 years. The AO should obtain the seized material and a satisfaction note from the AO of the investigated person to move.

The two-member bench comprising Sudhir Pareek(Judicial Member) and S.Rifaur Rahman(Accountant Member) analyzed the submissions along with the presented material. It marked that a search in the matter of Sunstar Group was undergone dated 19.12.2013 and u/s 153C a notice was issued dated 20.01.2016. The related assessment year was discovered to be AY 2016-17 as the satisfaction note was recorded before the issuance of the notice.

Read Also: IT Section 153C Limits Assessment to Documents Cited in Satisfaction Note for Proceedings Against ‘Other Person’

It was marked by the tribunal that the 6-year duration covered under section 153C is applicable before the AYs 2010-11 to 2015-16. As the notice for AY 2009-10 was not within the jurisdiction it followed prior judgements and set aside the assessment for AY 2009-10.

The filed appeal of the taxpayer was permitted.

Case TitleKamal Sharma vs. DCIT
CitationITA No.1218/DEL/2023
Date14.11.2024
AssesseeShri Ved Jain, Shri Aman Garg
RepresentedShri Sumer Singh Meena
Delhi ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software