• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Delhi HC Cancels GST Order for Lack of Valid Service of Show Cause Notice

Delhi HC's Order In The Case of Anil Kumar vs. Sales Tax Officer

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, the proprietor of N.S. Super Mart contested a Show Cause Notice (SCN) on December 15, 2023. Subsequently, an order-in-original was issued on April 3, 2024, under the Delhi GST law.

The GST SCN proposed a tax demand of ₹10.91 lakh, citing alleged excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to discrepancies between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B, failure to reverse ITC concerning exempt supplies, and ITC claimed from dealers whose registrations had been cancelled.

Under the “Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal, the notice as well as the reminders were uploaded. The applicant was clueless about the same mode of uploading, which results in a lack of awareness of the proceedings. Therefore, no response was submitted, and the order was passed ex parte based on non-prosecution, without granting any personal hearing.

The issue at hand is whether a notice uploaded on the GST portal, but only found in the “Additional Notices” section and not properly communicated to the taxpayer, can be used as a reason for making a decision without the taxpayer’s input. This decision could lead to an increase in tax charges.

High Court citation: HC held that the only uploading of a SCN and reminders under the “Additional Notices” tab, when the tab itself was not functioning or accessible to the applicant, did not direct to appropriate or effective service. The Court, relying on its earlier Division Bench decision in Neelgiri Machinery v. Commissioner, Delhi GST and Etemad Cargo, discovered that the applicant was refused a significant chance of hearing.

Read Also: How to Effortlessly Check the Validity of GST SCN & Orders

Therefore, the impugned order on 03.04.2024 was quashed. The case was remanded to the tax authority with directions to allow the applicant to submit a response within 4 weeks, grant a personal hearing on the mentioned date, and, after that, pass a reasoned order within 3 months.

Case TitleAnil Kumar vs. Sales Tax Officer
Case No.W.P.(C) 843/2026 & CM APPL. 4124/2026
For PetitionerMs Priyanka Rathi and
Mr Ashwini Chandrasekaran,
Advs.
Delhi High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Tax Offer 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates