• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


CESTAT Allows a Cement Trader to Claim Cenvat Credit on Welding Electrodes Used in the Production Process

Delhi CESTAT's Order In Case of M/s. Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Limited VS Commissioner of CGST

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that cement manufacturers are authorized to cenvat credit on welding electrodes as inputs used in the manufacture of final products, namely cement and clinker.

The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) has marked that according to sub-rule 4 of Rule 57-A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the credit of prescribed duty is permitted in respect of two categories of inputs, namely (i) inputs used in the manufacture of final products and (ii) inputs used in or concerning the manufacture of final products, whether directly or indirectly, and whether contained in the final product or not.

The taxpayer/applicant is a manufacturer of cement and clinker with manufacturing plants and machinery in Chittorgarh. They have obtained welding electrodes for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery, which are used for the manufacture of the products, i.e., cement and clinker. An SCN was issued that welding electrodes cannot be taken into account input, and hence, CENVAT credit was not available on them.

The proposed demand in the SCN has been dropped by the Assistant Commissioner.

A petition was been filed via the department contending that the CENVAT credit is not admissible on welding electrodes which are been utilised to repair and maintenance of plants and machinery and that these activities are not related to the manufacture of the final products. The petition was permitted and the order was passed affirming the demand as per the SCN.

Concerning the admissibility of the CENVAT credit, the problem has been raised on the welding electrodes as inputs.

While permitting the appeal the tribunal ruled that the appellant is qualified to get the advantage of CENVAT credit.

Case TitleM/s. Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and CGST
Final Order No.56022/2024
Date18.07.2024
Counsel For AppellantShri Saurabh Suman Sinha and Ms.Chitra Y. Parande, Advocates
Counsel For RespondentShri Rohit Issar
CESTAT DelhiRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates