• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Bombay HC: Review GST Tax Credit Application, Process Stopped Due to Typographical Error

Bombay HC's Order for Principal Global Services Pvt. Ltd

The Bombay High Court (HC) chaired by Justice Abhay Ahuja and Justice Nitin Jamdar ordered the Sales tax department to review the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Input Tax Credit (ITC) application for refund. It was also ordered by the High Court to assess the evidence that the petitioner presented along with the invoices and take a move on it.

The Petitioner, Principal Global Services Pvt. Ltd., applied to seek compensation of Rs. 7,53,20,729 on 11th January 2022 in the view of refund of GST ITC on Export of Goods and Services without payment of Integrated tax.

The application was inspected by the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax who found discrepancies. Therefore, they sent a show cause notice to the petitioner. The petitioner responded to the notice.

The issue, as per the invoices specified, is that services were exported to clients in Lowa State, USA. As opposed to this claim, a State with such a name doesn’t even exist in the US. The dealer clarified that this was an error or typo during the submission. The State’s correct name is believed to be Lova (iova). He requested to accept the submission.

Read Also: Bombay HC Orders Govt to Nominate Authentic Dept for IGST Refund

However, the Commissioner disapproved of the submissions made by the dealer. It was stated that typo mistakes are not common at all. In addition to this conclusion, the commissioner also observed that the same State name, Lowa, is used by the dealer in the invoice. Instead of exporting items, this is doing so. Also, there has not been provided any supportive documentation by the dealer such as dispatch proofs.

The bench noted that the typographical error is clear to be notified of because there is no such State in the US. The denoting name to that place is Lowa State, so, the clarification of the petitioner is reasonable and should have been regarded by the Deputy Commissioner. Also, it is obvious to the petitioner to supply supportive documents to claim the refund.

Case TitlePrincipal Global Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra & Others
CitationWrit Petition No. 1225 Of 2023
Date29.03.2023
Counsel For AppellantMr. Prakash Shah , Mr. Mihir Mehta and Mr. Jas Sanghavi
Counsel For RespondentSmt. S.D. Vyas
Bombay HCRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates