• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Assessee Receives GST Notice on Basis of Details from DGGI U/S 148: Bombay HC Quashes and Aside

Bombay HC's Order In Case of KEC International Ltd VS Union of India

The reassessment notices have been quashed by the Bombay High Court and have been issued based on the data obtained via the Directorate General of GST.

The bench of Justice K. R. Shriram and Justice Neela Gokhale has marked that the AO is referring to the data obtained from the Directorate General of GST. Nothing to demonstrate that he independently applied his mind to the material obtained or that he has analyzed the response from the applicant with the material received, which shows the total non-application of mind.

A reassessment notice issued u/s 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the order passed under Section 148A(d) has been contested by the applicant.

All submissions have been dismissed by the AO quoting that simply providing copies of purchase invoices, E-way Bill, Transport Bills and payments made via banking channels are not adequate to substantiate that the transaction made by the taxpayer company with EMI Transmission Ltd. is real.

AO said that the Directorate General of GST, Mumbai has recognized one Curzen Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as Blue Sea Commodities) was generating fake/bogus invoices for passing fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) without supply of goods to various companies and EMI Transmission Ltd. was one of them, as Petitioner dealt with EMI Transmission Ltd. and the transaction is non-genuine.

If the order itself reveals the lack of reasoning by the Assessing Officer, then granting approval u/s 151 shows a complete lack of critical thinking. The products purchased from EMI Transmission Ltd. were actually sold to third parties, and we agree with the Petitioner that without a purchase, there cannot be a sale, the taxpayer argued.

The order has been quashed by the court and the case is for de- novo consideration, which will be regarded by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO), who will be other than Lehandas Arjun Janbandhu, who passed the order. Therefore, under Section 148 the notice issued is quashed and set aside.

Case TitleKEC International Ltd VS Union of India
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.16487 OF 2023
Date07.05.2024
PetitionerMr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Aman Mishra i/b UBR Legal
RespondentMr. Eshaan Saroop i/b Mr. Vikas T. Khanchandani
Bombay High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates