• twitter-icon

Search results for: invest the amount

Bombay HC's Order In Case of Kalpita Arun Lanjekar Versus IT Officer

Bombay High Court Deletes Order Against Wife When the Alleged Investment Was Done by Her Husband

A reassessment order against a housewife when the alleged investment was made by her husband has been quashed by the Bombay High Court. The bench of Justice K. R. Shriram and Justice Neela Gokhale has noted that “We also have to notice that, surprisingly, the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax has also accorded sanction […]

Chandigarh ITAT's Order In Case of Manuj Jain HUF verses Pr. CIT

Chandigarh ITAT: Higher Official Can’t Use Revisionary Authority U/S 263 if AO Conducted a Proper Investigation

Finding that the taxpayer operates seasonal trade in hosiery items duly backed by documentary proof, which AO investigated accepting the said transactions and resultant profit has been carried to tax, the Chandigarh ITAT said that the PCIT cannot be allowed to invoke his jurisdiction under section 263 only because he assumes that there is the […]

Calcutta HC's Order for Pacharia Exports Private Limited

Calcutta HC: ITC Not Permitted, Amount Paid to 3rd Party Instead of the Particular Dealer

The writ petitioner is not qualified to take advantage of the ITC since he did not pay the amount to the selling dealer and did it to a third party, the Calcutta High Court ruled. The bench comprising Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Supratim Bhattacharya has noted that the writ petitioner cannot insert words […]

Chennai ITAT's Order In Case of Ethiraj Hotel Mart vs DCIT

Chennai ITAT Removes Addition Related to Inexplicable Investment in the Difference of Stock Valuation

The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the addition of unelaborated investment in stock as a difference in the valuation of stock. Mahavir Singh (Vice President) and Manjunatha. G. (Accountant Member), presiding over the bench, have observed that the assessee declared additional income attributable to excess stock discovered during a survey. […]

Kolkata CESTAT's Order for Shri. Rajeshwar Prasad Choudhari

CESTAT Kolkata Rejects Tax Demand, No Verification By Dept for the Amount Noted in Form 26AS

The demand for Service Tax only based on form 26 AS given via the income tax department has been set aside by the Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Appellant, Shri. Rajeshwar Prasad Choudhari contested the impugned order passed through the Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & CX Ranchi, wherein […]

Bombay High Court's Order for T.V. Patel Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC: It’s Not Fair to Charge Taxes Based on Assumptions Made By a Lower Court Without Proper Investigation

The ruling by the Bombay High Court clarifies that it’s impermissible to levy taxes on an amount that the assessee hasn’t accrued or received, based solely on the assumption that the Small Causes Court might eventually favour the appellant or assessee by ordering such a sum. Justice G.S. Kulkarni and Justice Jitendra Jain noted that […]

Madras HC’s Order for M/s.Shewil Trading Company

Madras HC Orders Departmental Investigation into Unauthorized Use of Login ID, Enabling GST Evasion

The Madras High Court has instructed the state tax officer to probe the misuse of login IDs linked to potential tax evasion by unidentified individuals. Justice C. Saravanan’s bench noted the petitioner’s claim of a third party exploiting their login ID to file returns and funnel a substantial input tax credit to this unauthorized entity. […]

700 Boutiques in Punjab Under GST Radar

PETD Investigates Around 700 Boutiques in Punjab Due to GST Evasion

The Punjab Excise and Taxation Department (PETD) is currently scrutinizing approximately 700 boutiques throughout Punjab due to their non-compliance with GST payments and the issuance of obligatory customer invoices. Among these boutiques, there are 40 prominent establishments located in Patiala, Ludhiana, and other districts, each boasting annual turnovers in the lakhs, yet failing to adhere […]

Bombay HC's Order for Hemant Dinkar Kandlur

Bombay HC: Investing in India Will Not Be Affected by Any Amendment Made to I-T Section 54

Recently, the Bombay High Court has ruled that the amendment made in accordance with section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, doesn’t have a retrospective impact on limiting investments in India. This amended provision takes effect from April 1, 2015, and will be applicable in the future, but not before the amendment date. The […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software