Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) held that a three-month gap between the issuance of a GST show cause notice (SCN) and the passing of a final order must be there under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. A writ petition has been submitted by the applicant, A.M. Marketplace Pvt. Ltd concerning whether the […]
The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has provided relief to the business community, especially in Maharashtra, by holding that GST is not applicable on the transfer of plots allotted by the MIDC to third parties. This judgment clears long-standing confusion caused by GST notices issued to several companies over the years. The ruling […]
The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court has decided that a GST clearance certificate required for a government tender must be given by the GST Authority itself and not by a private professional like a Chartered Accountant. The Court does not find anything unfair in rejecting a technical bid for not following this required […]
The reassessment notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been quashed by the Bombay High Court, citing that the reassessment notice did not comply with the mandate that the Faceless Assessing Officer only has the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment and not the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Also, even international taxation matters […]
On November 14, 2025, the High Court of Bombay in Aurangabad turned down a request from M/s Suman Construction, a civil contractor registered with the government. The company was disputing a demand for service tax that was related to the road construction projects it completed for government departments. The problem before the court was whether […]
The Bombay High Court has determined that an assessee should not face penalties for delays in the submission of their tax return attributable to the late guidance provided by their chartered accountant. The bench mentioned that the delay is not because of any negligence on the taxpayer’s end but due to insufficient suggestions via the […]
The Bombay High Court ruled that the authority must pay ₹71.31 lakh as interest on the refund of illegally collected IGST (Integrated Goods and Services Tax) under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on ocean freight. Justices M.S. Sonak and Advait M. Sethna considered that the applicant had submitted IGST, which the respondents used up to […]
The Bombay High Court’s Aurangabad bench, in a relief to the hospitality sector, had delivered an interim stay on the charge of 18% GST on restaurant services situated within hotels where the room tariff surpasses Rs 7,500 per day. The Union of India, the GST Council, and the State of Maharashtra received the notices from […]
Bombay High Court ruled on 14th October that a company’s GST returns cannot be disclosed under the RTI Act. The Aurangabad bench, single-judge Justice Arun Pednekar, stated that section 158(1) of the GST Act restricts the disclosure of information of GST returns to third parties and that section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act also exempts […]
