• twitter-icon

Search results for: Section 69a

Mumbai ITAT's Order in The Case of M/s. Rucha Consultancy LLP vs. DCIT

ITAT Mumbai: WhatsApp Image Insufficient for Section 69A Addition Without Corroborative Evidence

Based on a WhatsApp image found on an employee’s mobile phone, and without any corroborative evidence, an addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, cannot be upheld, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, ruled. The bench termed it a ‘dumb document’. The assessee, Rucha Consultancy LLP, filed its return with […]

Surat ITAT Order In Case on Jayeshbhai Becharbhai Chovatiya vs. ITO

ITAT Surat Slashes Section 69A Tax Addition from ₹72.8 Lakh to ₹2 Lakh, Citing Home Loan Credit & Cash Balance

The ITAT Bench in Surat, Gujarat reduced an individual’s additional tax assessment from ₹72,81,674 to just ₹2,00,000. This decision was made after recognizing the taxpayer’s home loan and the cash they had available. Jayeshbhai Becharbhai Chovatiya, a taxpayer, deposited Rs. 72,81,674 into three different bank accounts when certain high-denomination currency notes were no longer valid. […]

Allahabad HC's Order In Case of The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax and Another vs. Sushil Kumar Sharma

Allahabad HC: Section 69A of the Income Tax Act Does Not Apply to Fund Transfers Between Accounts

It was carried by the Allahabad High Court that the finding of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that when an agreement between parties establishes a direct transfer of money, accomplishing so indirectly by holding the funds in a distinct account before sending them to the final account, does not […]

Calcutta HC's Order in The Case of Vishal Jhajharia V/S The Assessment Unit, IT Dept.

Calcutta HC: Dept’s Failure to Serve Section 69A Notice Invalidates Assessment Order

The assessment order has been quashed by the Calcutta High Court on the foundation that the department has losses to place the taxpayer on the notice concerning the addition u/s 69A of the income tax. It was noted by the bench of Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury that the judgment incurred via the respondent department as […]

Delhi HC's Order In Case of CIT Versus Hersh Washesher Chadha

Bookkeeping is Required To Invoke Section 69A Of Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court

Section 69A of the income tax act could merely be invoked in which the books of accounts are been maintained, Delhi High Court mentioned. The bench consisting of Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice Girish Kathpalia noted that the individual in question, a non-resident Indian, derives income in India from bank interest and income tax refunds […]

Chennai ITAT's Order for M/s. Prakash Ferrous Industries Private Limited

ITAT Chennai Removes IT Sections 69A and 69C Addition Without Authentic Evidence

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Chennai in a ruling has dismissed the appeal by the Revenue (Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) and the Cross Objections by the assessee, Prakash Ferrous Industries Private Limited, against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 18, Chennai on 23.03.2023 for the assessment year 2020-21. The Foundation […]

Cuttack ITAT's Order in The Case of Tekchand Harilal vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO)

Cuttack ITAT Deletes ₹5.01 Lakh Addition U/S 69A; Holds Demonetisation-Era Cash Deposits Were Business Receipts

The addition of ₹5,01,500 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been overturned by the Cuttack Bench of the ITAT, which held that the cash deposits made during the demonetisation period were substantiated as business receipts. Tekchand Harilal, a firm that operates as a distributor of […]

Delhi HC's Order In Case of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 V/S Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court: No Provision for Cross-Objections Under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act

The Delhi High Court has ruled that Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which relates to appeals to High Courts, does not envisage the filing of cross-objections by the opposite party, unlike Order XLI Rule 22 CPC. A division bench of Justices Yashwant Varma and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar stated that “The Legislature appears […]

Jaipur ITAT's Order in The Case of Ratika Kumbhat vs. Income Tax Officer

ITAT Jaipur: ₹12 Lakh Addition U/S 69A Unjustified; Sundry Debtors Not Unexplained Income

The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has determined that the ₹12 lakh addition u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was unwarranted, as the sundry debtors recorded in the books could not be classified as unexplained income. The petitioner Ratika Kumbhat was selected for the limited scrutiny to validate the […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software