• twitter-icon

Search results for: Section 143(3)

Delhi ITAT's Order in The Case of Seema Jain vs. DCIT, Central Circle-31

ITAT Delhi Quashes Tax Assessment Due to Incorrect Application of Section 143(3) Instead of Section 153C

The order has been quashed by the Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) via the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT) for the assessment year (AY) 2021-22, where the assessing officer (AO) had applied Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rather than the appropriate Section 153C of the Income Tax […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in The Case of Motorola Solutions India Private Limited vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Delhi ITAT Quashes Time-Barred Assessment; DRP Proceedings Section 144C Can’t Extend Limitation U/S 153

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the actions taken by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, do not supersede or prolong the limitation period outlined in Section 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Motorola Solutions India Private Limited submitted the […]

Kerala HC's Order In Case of Sterling Farm Research and Services Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT

Kerala HC: Section 263 Can Be Applied If AO Fails to Address Core Issues in Tax Order

The Kerala High Court ruled that Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can be invoked where the Assessing Officer (AO) is not able to address the main issue in the assessment order. The bench stated that the problem does not appear to have been addressed by the assessing authority when issuing an order […]

Jodhpur ITAT's Order In the Case of M/s Jain Natural Pickles Private Limited vs ACIT

Jodhpur ITAT Permits Rectification Under Section 154 for Inadvertent Double Taxation Errors

The ITAT Jodhpur has ruled that rectification under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is allowable where an inadvertent mistake in tax return filing results in double taxation of the same income. The appellant, M/s Jain Natural Pickles Private Limited, encountered a survey u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, during which […]

Delhi ITAT Order in the Case of Anita Garg vs. Income Tax Officer

ITAT Delhi Quashes Assessment Framed U/S 143(3) Due to Invalid Notice Format U/S 143(2)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi ruled that the assessment conducted by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) on December 27, 2019, following a notice issued under Section 143(2) on September 22, 2018, is invalid. The tribunal found that the notice was not in the format required by the Central Board of Direct […]

Chhattisgarh HC's Order in The Case of Raj Kumar Bothra vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

Chhattisgarh HC: Section 143(1)(a) Cannot Be Invoked to Disallow EPF/ESI Claims Pending Before SC

Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 1961 Act), cannot be invoked by the Assessing Officer (AO) to disallow a claim when the issue involved such as the deductibility of employees’ contributions to EPF/ESI under Section 36(1)(va) is pending consideration before the Supreme Court, as in Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT [(2023) […]

Jharkhand HC's Order in The Case of M/s New Punjab Motor Transport vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax

Jharkhand HC Quashes ITAT Order on Section 40(a)(ia) Based on Overruled SC Precedent

The Jharkhand High Court has overturned a decision made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Circuit Bench in Ranchi. The Court found that the Tribunal’s ruling relied on an earlier case that has since been dismissed by the Supreme Court. Earlier, the whole addition of the Assessing officer has been removed by the tribunal […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order in the Case of Vardhabhai Jethabhai Patel vs The Income Tax Officer

Ahmedabad ITAT: Section 271B Penalties Only Apply for Non-Audits U/S 44AB, Not for Late Submission of Audit Reports

As per the Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), it said that Section 271B penalty of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is applicable merely when the accounts are not audited as mandated u/s 44AB not just for the late submission of the audit report. The taxpayer Vardhabhai Jethabhai Patel, is an individual […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in the Case of Bhartiya Samruddhi Investments and Consulting Services Limited Vs. ACIT

Delhi ITAT Quashes Reassessment, Rules Section 147 Cannot Be Invoked for Mere Change of Opinion

The reassessment of the assessee has been quashed by the Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), which held that an assessment u/s 147 of the I-T Act,1961 cannot be reopened based on mere modification of opinion. Bhartiya Samruddhi Investments and Consulting Services Limited, the appellant-assessee, asserted ₹91,47,928 as ‘sundry advances/assets written […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software