• twitter-icon

Search results for: Jodhpur ITAT

Jodhpur ITAT's Order In the Case of M/s Jain Natural Pickles Private Limited vs ACIT

Jodhpur ITAT Permits Rectification Under Section 154 for Inadvertent Double Taxation Errors

The ITAT Jodhpur has ruled that rectification under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is allowable where an inadvertent mistake in tax return filing results in double taxation of the same income. The appellant, M/s Jain Natural Pickles Private Limited, encountered a survey u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, during which […]

Jodhpur ITAT's Order for Adhunik Khanan VA Parivahan Theka Sahakari Samiti Ltd

Jodhpur ITAT: TDS Exemption U/S 194C If You Have the Vehicles at Your Disposal, Even If You Don’t Own Them

The Jodhpur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the taxpayer, the legal owner, is not liable for TDS under Section 194C, where a declaration under Section 194C(6) accompanying a PAN is received via the payees who have the vehicle, but they are not registered owners. The bench of S. Seethalakshmi (Judicial Member) […]

Jodhpur ITAT’s Order for Sarla Singhvi Charitable

Jodhpur ITAT: No Additional Liability for Delayed Form 10 Filing When Favoured by CIT(E) for ITR U/S 139

No addition can be made for the delay in filing Form No. 10 within the due date of the Income Tax Return under Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 since the same is been condoned by the commissioner of the income tax (exemption), Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Jodhpur ruled. The taxpayer, […]

Jodhpur ITAT's Order for Dinesh Infrastructure Private Limited

Jodhpur ITAT: Dept Can’t Charge Late Fees or Interest for TDS Based on the Intimation U/S 200A Before Amendment

The Income Tax Department lacks the authority to impose late fees and interest related to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) as per the notification under Section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, before the amendment of the law, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur bench, has ruled. In this case, Dinesh Infrastructure Private, […]

Jodhpur ITAT'S Order for Shri Devkripa Textile Mills (P) Ltd

Jodhpur ITAT: Directors’ Remuneration Can’t Be Disallowed Despite on Temporary Hold

There is no need to disallow part of the director’s remuneration and depreciation if the business is stopped due to a temporary lull, the Jodhpur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled. The mere pre-requisite for the permission of depreciation would be that the business must not have been closed out once and […]

Jodhpur ITAT'S Order for Smt. Bhawna Nagori

Jodhpur ITAT: Belated ITR Can’t Be Filed After Deadline Under I-T Act

The late return could not get submitted post lapse of 1 year from the finish of the assessment year (AY), the income tax appellate tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench. The stated observation was made by the Jodhpur ITAT at the time when the petition was preferred before it via the taxpayer as against the order of […]

Jodhpur ITAT's Order for Narain Dal And Oil Mills vs. ITO Ward 1

ITAT Jodhpur Remands ₹37.92 Lakh IGST Disallowance Over CA’s Clerical Mistake in Form 3CB

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur bench, dealt with the disallowance of an Input GST claim of ₹37.92 lakh that had emerged because of an incorrect entry made by the Chartered Accountant (CA) of the taxpayer in Form 3CB. The Tribunal ruled that, as the claim had failed for the desire of external verification, […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In the Case of Staubli Tec Systems India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO

ITAT Mumbai Grants Relief to Taxpayers Denied NTR Benefits for Not Filing Form 10IC

The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on October 31, 2025, ruled that a taxpayer’s claims under the new tax regime could not be rejected because of a delay in filing the Form 10IC, after the legal deadline. The same ruling has been arrived at in the backdrop of a case submitted […]

Pune ITAT's Order In Case of Shrikrishna Laxminarayan Thakur vs. ITO

Pune ITAT: Late Fee U/S 234E for TDS Return Filed Before 1st June 2015 Is Not Justified

The Pune ITAT held that levying late fees under Section 234E for TDS returns processed before June 1, 2015, was unjustified, noting that the revision to Section 200A was yet to take effect. The taxpayer, Shrikrishna Laxminarayan Thakur, furnished the TDS returns for diverse quarters across Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17. All these […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software