Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
The Madras High Court in the matter of Tvl. Norton Granites & Properties Private Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (ST), dismissed the petitioner’s claim for a GST refund. The petitioner, Tvl. Norton Granites is involved in the KG Foundation for construction services and levied a GST of 18%. The applicant assuming the applicable GST rate was […]
The Madras High Court remanded the IGST refund case for reconsideration as the refund was not processed because of the alert raised by the Director General of Data Analytics & Risk Management ( DGRAM ). As per the impugned GST order, the court remarked that the IGST refund claim was that the dealer had not […]
The Delhi High Court asked the appropriate officer to expedite the refund process for a petitioner who asked the Court to direct the refund of a sum of Rs.81,79,52 u/s 54 of the Central Goods and Services Act,2017. The applicant, AJ Flight Reservations Pvt. Ltd., represented by Advocate Vineet Bhatia, had filed a refund claim […]
The case of Surana and Company vs. Union of India reached the Chhattisgarh High Court related to the non-refund of a 6% differential GST obligation carried via contractors for works contracts. The court rendered the refund of the excess tax filed in the said duration. The applicability of notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), amended by notification […]
The Delhi High Court was directed to apply for a refund mandated under section 54 of the Central Goods and Service Tax ( CGST ) Act, 2017 for a refund of GST paid. The court removes the period between 19.01.2024 and the date of judgment for limitation. The applicant, Pedersen Consultants India Pvt Ltd, asks […]
The decision of the Gujarat High Court, on a special civil application, while highlighting the binding nature of its directions on respondent authorities, remarked that once the Court furnishes the directions, it holds authority over the respondent authorities, and therefore, the respondent authorities are liable to comply with the directions that the Court issues when […]
During remanding the matter the Madras High Court ruled that the refund claim needed to be examined and determined established on the documents related to the claiming of the ITC and the export of the product on zero-rated grounds. The petitioner has incurred the GST refund claims on time and cannot be faulted for the […]
The Calcutta High Court in a recent statutory development has provided a significant judgment for the case of Sunil Kumar Poddar vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeal) pertinent to the rejection of a Goods and Services Tax (GST) refund. The applicant has been involved in zero-rated goods supply asking for a refund of the unused ITC however […]
The Madras High Court has ruled that a claim for an Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) refund must be submitted within two years from the relevant date, computed from the export date of the goods through any mode. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy’s bench noted that the refund claim in question pertains to exports conducted between […]
