• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Tripura HC Quashes CGST Order for Reopening Issues Already Examined by State GST Authorities

Tripura HC Order In The Case Of Sri Shekhar Union Of India

On June 30, the Tripura High Court stated that the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) authorities cannot initiate adjudication proceedings on issues that have already been addressed by the State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) authorities regarding the same subject matter.

A Division Bench of Chief Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice Biswajit Palit set aside a challenge to a demand cum show cause notice on 22 July 2024 and an Order-in-Original dated 3 February 2025 issued u/s 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The provision deals with unpaid tax recovery or short paid due to fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts.

Relying on the decision of the Supreme Court judgment in Armour Security (India) Ltd., the Court said that “parallel proceedings should not be initiated by other tax administrations when one of the tax administrations has already initiated intelligence-based enforcement action.”

The dispute emerged from the proceedings initiated by the CGST authorities against the applicant for an alleged excess claim of ITC for the financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20, including allegations of short payment of GST for those years and issues concerning the FY 2020-21.

Read More: A Full Guide to Claim ITC in GSTR-3B Form Using GST IMS

The Court said that the CGST authorities do not have jurisdiction to analyse the problem of excess claim of the ITC for the financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20, as the problem had earlier been made the subject matter of proceedings begun by the SGST authorities.

The bench said that the proceedings for the alleged short GST payment for the financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20, as well as issues for the FY 2020-21 that were not included under the SGST proceedings, could continue.

Therefore, the HC set aside the impugned adjudication order and asked the adjudicating authority to pass a fresh order within 3 months, after furnishing a chance of hearing to the applicant.

Case TitleSri Shekhar Chandra Podder v. The Union of India & Ors.
Case No.WP(C) No.285 of 2025
For PetitionerMr. Bibhal Nandi Majumder, Sr. Advocate
For RespondentMr. Bidyut Majumder, Deputy SGI
Tripura High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Tax Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Offer in 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates