• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Kolkata ITAT Deletes ₹7.18 Lakh Disallowance on Business Expenditure, Grants Relief to Assessee

Kolkata ITAT's Order In Case of Bengal Peerless Housing Development Company Ltd. Vs. DCIT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata Bench, deleted a disallowance of Rs. 7.18 lakh, observing that a difference of opinion regarding the head of expenditure or its nomenclature could not justify the denial of a deduction when the expenses were incurred for the taxpayer’s business.

The taxpayer, Bengal Peerless Housing Development Company Ltd., had claimed legal and professional expenses of Rs. 62.16 lakh. In assessment proceedings, the AO noted that specific expenses of Rs 7.18 lakh did not come within the category of legal expenses. Therefore, the AO disallowed it.

The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance made by the AO. The dissatisfied taxpayer filed an appeal before the Tribunal.

The taxpayer before the Tribunal claimed that the impugned expenses had been made for its business activities and were permissible as business expenditure. The revenue upheld the orders passed by the lower authorities.

Also Read: Kolkata ITAT Condones More Than 800-Day Delay After Consultant’s Death During COVID-19

The Tribunal, including Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member) and Pradip Kumar Choubey (Judicial Member), said that the expenses had been made via monthly retainership charges. These retainership arrangements were very common in business where persons were retained every month.

The Tribunal emphasised that differing opinions regarding the head of expenditure or nomenclature should not be a reason to deny deductions, as long as the expenses are related to the assessee’s business and the Assessing Officer (AO) has not questioned their authenticity. In the absence of any findings that challenge the genuineness of the expenses, the disallowance cannot be upheld.

Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and asked to remove the disallowance of Rs. 7.18 lakh. The appeal of the taxpayer was authorised to that scope.

Case TitleBengal Peerless Housing Development Company Ltd. Vs. DCIT
Case No:ITA No.259/KOL/2026
Counsel For AppellantShri Soumitra Choudhary
Counsel For RespondentShri Bonnie Deb Barma
Kolkata ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Tax Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Offer in 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software