• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Chandigarh ITAT Directs Refund of ₹37.88 Lakh for Short TDS Credit on Property Sale

Chandigarh ITAT's Order in The Case of Shri Amardeep Sandhu vs The ITO

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has issued a directive for the refund of ₹37.88 lakh within one month. This decision arises from a determination that there was an under-allocation of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) credit related to a property sale, in accordance with section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act 961.

Old: The taxpayer, Amardeep Sandhu, was a Canadian non-resident who sold a house in Chandigarh for Rs 4.65 crore in AY 2023-24, on which ₹1.20 crore was deducted as TDS at 26%. On 19-12-2023, he filed his return declaring taxable income of ₹3.71 crore, including long-term capital gains, and claimed a refund of ₹37.88 lakh.

On December 19, 2023, he submitted his income tax return, which reported a taxable income of ₹3.71 crore, including long-term capital gains. Additionally, he requested a refund amounting to ₹37.88 lakh.

U/s 143(1) CPC issued an intimation dated 19-01-2024 raising a demand of ₹29.95 lakh after reducing the TDS credit to ₹63.27 lakh by applying Rule 37BA(2)(i). The correct income and TDS have been exhibited by the return and Form 26AS; however, the error has emerged due to the TIS incorrectly showing the same property transaction twice.

The record has been analysed by the tribunal with the support of the representative and observed inconsistencies between the intimation of the CPC u/s 143(1) and the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)[CIT(A)].

The claim has been rejected by the CIT(A) for full TDS credit because the part corresponds to another person, Mehtab Kaur, and mentions the non-submission of the bank statement.

The two-member bench, including Rajpal Yadav (Vice President) and Krinwant Sahay (Accountant Member), discovered the same reasoning to be ineffective, as it does not elaborate on how the name of another person appeared in the TDS credit or why the explanation given was not considered. It said that the CIT(A) must verify the record before deciding the matter.

Read Also: Easy Explanation on TDS for Property Sale by NRI (New Guide)

By considering that CPC has mistakenly cut the TDS credit, and CIT(A) has unnecessarily validated it, the tribunal has permitted the appeal and mandated the department to refund Rs 37,88,470 within 1 month.

As per that, the appeal was permitted.

Case TitleShri Amardeep Sandhu vs The ITO
Case No.ITA No. 92/CHD/2025
Assessee byShri Anil Batra
Revenue byShri Vivek Vardhan
Chandigarh High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2025

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software