• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT Bangalore: MAT Inapplicable to ‘Corresponding New Banks’ Under Section 115JB

Bangalore ITAT's Order in The Case of M/s. Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs. Addl. CIT LTU

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Bangalore ruled that the provisions related to Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act do not apply to the taxpayer bank. As a result, the tax on book profits is not applicable to the bank. The tribunal has allowed the appeal filed by the taxpayer bank.

Facts- Banking business belongs to the taxpayer. Investigation was proposed for the taxpayer case, and as per that, notices u/s 143(2) as well as 142(1) of the Act were issued, including a questionnaire for different details to verify the income tax return claims of the taxpayer.

Under the regular provisions, the assessment order has been passed by the AO by assessing the total income of Rs. 1750,77,68,383/- and also ruled that section 115JB of the Act applies to the taxpayer bank and determined the book profit at Rs 447,95,02,243.

The appeal has been permitted partly by CIT(A), and the present appeal is submitted, being dissatisfied.

The Special Bench ruled in favour of the taxpayer regarding the referred question. It was determined that clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, which was inserted by the Finance Act, 2012, effective from the assessment year 2013-14, does not apply to banks that were formed as “corresponding new banks” under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970.

Consequently, the provisions of section 115JB are not applicable, and therefore, the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) on book profits does not apply to such banks. This ruling pertains to ITA No. 424/Mum/2020 and ITA No. 3740/Mum/2018 involving the Union Bank of India and the Central Bank of India.

Read Also: Bangalore ITAT: Addition Made by AO U/S 28(iv) Unjustified for Returned or Destroyed Test Assets Determine by MAP

Before the taxpayer bank, it held that the provisions of section 115JB of the Act cannot be applicable, and therefore, the tax on book profits (MAT) does not apply to the taxpayer bank.

Case TitleM/s. Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs. Addl. CIT LTU
Case No.ITA No.234/Bang/2025
Appellant by : Smt. Lalitha Rameshwaran, A.R
Respondent by :Sri Rajashekhar M., D.R
ITAT BangaloreRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Powering India’s Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software