• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Allahabad HC: GST Notices Require Alternative Service after GSTIN Cancellation

Allahabad HC's Order in Case of M/S Ahs Steels Vs. Commissioner Of State Taxes And Another

Goods and Services Tax (GST) notices are to be served via alternative means once registration of the taxpayer has been cancelled, and only uploading the notice on the GST portal is insufficient, Allahabad High Court mentioned in a ruling.

In this case, a writ petition was filed through a business, M/s Ahs Steels, whose GST registration had been cancelled dated March 18, 2019, after which no business activities were performed. Subsequently, an order u/s 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 was passed without serving the notices, which is certainly a breach of Natural Justice Principles.

The case is concerned with the fact that a show-cause notice concerning alleged tax obligations has been uploaded on the GST portal post the cancellation of the registration of the applicant directing to an order being passed without direct communication to the business owner.

Hearing the contentions of both parties the court mentioned that once the registration of the taxpayer gets cancelled then they are no longer needed to track the GST portal for the notices.

Hence the authorities need to serve the notices through other means like physical delivery or email, to ensure compliance with the principles of natural justice. The counsel of the applicant directed to the earlier ruling of the court in M/s Katyal Industries v. State of U.P., which supported this stance.

The Allahabad High Court, in the matter of Katyal Industries, with an identical case, referred the applicant to consider the GST demand order itself to be the notice.

It was found by Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Vipin Chandra Dixit that the failure to serve the notice via other means breaches the principles of natural justice, which shall result in the cancellation of the impugned order.

Read Also: GST | Allahabad HC: Tax Cases Can’t Be Relegated to Alternate Remedy if Facts Are Uncontested

The bench referred the tax authorities to furnish a fresh notice and proceed as per the law.

Case TitleM/S Ahs Steels Vs. Commissioner Of State Taxes And Another
CitationWRIT TAX No. – 1676 of 2024
Date15.10.2024
Counsel for PetitionerPraveen Kumar, Vaibhav Singh
Counsel for RespondentC.S.C.
Allahabad High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates