• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Karnataka HC: 7 Days Should Be Granted for Responding to an Income Tax Notice Issued U/S 148a(b)

Karnataka HC's Order In The Case of Bangalore Thulaseedas Srinath V/S IT Officer

The applicant, Bangalore Thulaseedas Srinath contested several notices and orders issued to the applicant, including those u/s 148A(b), 148A(d), 148, 147 r/w 144 and 144B and pertinent penalty notices u/s 274 read with Sections 272A(1)(d), 270A and 271B.

It was furnished by the applicant that the income tax notice issued u/s 148A(b) of the Act was issued dated 11.03.2024 and was asked to respond on 15.03.2023, which period is less than the time stipulated u/s 148A(b).

It was claimed that such a due date does not follow the legal need of furnishing at least 7 days for a reply as cited in Section 148A(b) of the Act. The same section obligated that the taxpayer should be furnished a minimum of 7 days to answer to notice before the issuance of a notice under section 148.

The Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act reads as follows:-

148A. The Assessing Officer shall, before issuing any notice under section 148.-

(A) xxx      

(B) Furnishes a chance of being heard to the taxpayer via serving on him a notice to show cause within that time, as might be cited in the notice, being not less than 7 days and however not more than 30 days from the date on which this notice is issued or such time, as might get extended by him based on the applicant in this regard, as to why a notice u/s 148 must not get furnished on the grounds of the data which recommends that the income levied to tax has not undergone assessment for the pertinent assessment year and consequences of the inquiry performed, if any, as per the clause, (a);

With the contention of the applicant Justice S. Suni Dutt Yadav agreed showing that the insufficient answer breaches the norms of natural justice and caused prejudice. The court has declared the notices issued Under Section 148A(b) and the forthcoming orders and the penalty notices to be not valid.

Subsequently, the notices along with the orders in question were being set aside, with the court allowing the Revenue the freedom to issue the new notices and take precise measures within the law.

Read Also:- Steps to Verify an Income Tax Notice Using DIN with Benefits

Case TitleBangalore Thulaseedas Srinath V/S IT Officer
CitationWP No. 14325 of 2024
Date25. June.2024
Counsel For AppellantSRI. RAVI SHANKAR S V., ADVOCATE
Counsel For RespondentSRI. M. DILIP., JUNIOR STANDING COUNSEL
Karnataka High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software