• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Kolkata ITAT: Can’t Claim Tax Deduction for Unpaid Employee Contributions (PF & ESI) to Account

Kolkata ITAT's Order for Jankalyan Vinimay Pvt. Ltd

The Kolkata ITAT learning that the taxpayer’s returns have been processed in the Computer Processing Centre held that when the auditors have reported in the audit report that employees’ contributions have been deducted by the taxpayer from the employee’s salaries but not deposited within the deadline furnished under PF&ESI Act, assessee could not avail for any deduction.

The ITAT allowed such a ruling while referring to the law laid by the Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services (P) Limited vs CIT.

The Bench of Rajpal Yadav (Vice-President) and Dr. Manish Borad (Accountant Member) witnessed that “if employees’ contribution is not being paid to the respective PF & ESI Acts, then, deduction cannot be claimed by an assessee”. (Para 9)

Under the matter, the taxpayer company preferred the ongoing petition contesting the measure of CIT(A) in verifying the disallowance made by the AO on the basis of the belated deposit of PF and ESI to the respective government account after the stipulated due date as per the Income-tax Act vis-a-vis PF Act.

The Bench noted that a court wishes for the dispute between the parties and the reason could engage on the decision on the point and engage the decision on the fact of law which might bear on the ultimate consequence of the case.

When the provision is been interpreted by the court then the same decides as to what the definition and effect of the words utlised via legislature and the same is a declaration for the rule, the Bench stated.

Read Also: Easy Generate PF/ ESI Challan Via Gen Payroll Software

The Bench clarified that the judgment claims as to what the legislature had said on promulgation of the law, and the declaration is this was the law, this is the law, and in this way, the provision shall be construed.

ITAT agreed with the IT authority’s decision and dismissed the taxpayer’s petition.

Case TitleJankalyan Vinimay Pvt. Ltd Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
CitationI.T .A. No. 776/KOL/2022 Assessment Year: 2019-2020
Date07.02.2024
Appearances byShri Miraj D. Shah, A.R., appeared on behalf of the assessee

Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue
Kolkata ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software