• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Delhi HC Orders Restoration of GSTIN Due to Lack of Proper Opportunity

Delhi HC's Order for M/S EEN EEN Sales Corporation

The Delhi High Court ruled that taxpayers were not given a chance to raise objections regarding the retrospective cancellation of GST registration.

A panel consisting of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Ravinder Dudeja has reinstated the petitioner’s GST registration to its initial number.

The petitioner, who is also the assessee, contested a show-cause notice that demanded an explanation as to why the GST registration had been cancelled. The petitioner expressed dissatisfaction with the order that retroactively cancelled the GST registration from February 4, 2023.

The show cause notice lacks a specific reason for the proposed cancellation, citing “non-compliance with specified provisions in the GST Act or its prescribed Rules.” The notice merely presents an excerpt from the statutory provisions without providing details or specifying the alleged non-compliance by the petitioner.

According to Section 29(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the proper officer can cancel a person’s GST registration from a suitable date, even retrospectively, if the conditions outlined in the subsection are met. However, such retrospective cancellation cannot be automatic; it requires the proper officer’s considered judgment.

This determination should be objective and not arbitrary. Cancelling a taxpayer’s registration retrospectively, especially during a period of compliance with filed returns, demands a cogent reason.

The department argues that one consequence of retroactive registration cancellation is the denial of input tax credit to the taxpayer’s customers for supplies made by the taxpayer.

The court set aside both the show cause notice and the cancellation order.

It ruled that the respondent could pursue further actions for retroactive registration cancellation, but such actions must adhere to legal procedures. This includes issuing a proper show cause notice and providing the petitioner with an opportunity for a hearing.

Case TitleM/s EEN EEN Sales Corporation Vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax
Order NoW.P.(C) 331/2024 & CM APPL. 1505/2024
Date10.01.2024
For the PetitionerMr. Pranay Jain, Advocate
For the RespondentMr. Arnav Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel with
Mr. Chetanya Kapoor, Advocate
Delhi High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates