• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


SC Directs GST Council to Relook GST Refund Formula on Inverted Duty Structure

Supreme Court Order for Revised GST Refund Formula

The refund shall be furnished to the credit that collects on inputs beneath the inverted duty for the GST regime said Supreme court. As per the order, the Madras High court placed it alongside the order of the Gujarat high court.

The appeal has been acknowledged which the GST department urged to go through again inside the formula of the refund calculation.

The inverted duty structure reveals the more special taxes upon the input and lower tax on output or the ultimate product. There are various products like footwear, which have an inverted duty structure. But Section 54(3) of the CGST Act orders refund and rule 89(5) of CGST Rules gives a formula for the same, the amendment has changed the formula which started on July 1, 2017.

The improvised formula does not include the input services from the ITC range seen under the refund calculation. Hence the substituted rule (Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules) refused the refund on the ITC claimed on the input services and permitted the refund of the income tax credits only on the inputs.



What is Madras High Court Mentioned?

Madras high court towards the concern of Tvl.Transtonnelstroy Afcons Joint Venture vs Union of India, held in a different way. It specified that the “Refund is a statutory right and the extension of the benefit of refund only to the unutilised credit that accumulates on account of the rate of tax on input goods being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies by excluding unutilised input tax credit that accumulated on account of input services is a valid classification and a valid exercise of legislative power.”

What is Circulated by the Gujarat High Court?

But the Gujarat High court towards the concern of VKC footsteps vs Union of India ruled that the taxpayer’s right to claim the refund towards the input services beneath the inverted duty structure beneath GST. Strict on the opinion on the explanation of the rule that does not accept the refund of the unused input tax furnished upon the input services which comes under the ITC collected towards the inverted duty structure is “ultra vires the provision of Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017.”

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates