• twitter-icon

Search results for: Assessment Year

Delhi HC's Order In Case of ATS Township Pvt Ltd vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Delhi HC: Section 153C of IT Act Requires AO’s Satisfaction, Not Tax Portal Uploads

It was carried by the Delhi High Court that the provision u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessing officer of a searched person to record ‘satisfaction’ and handover documents for undisclosed income of another person cannot be replaced by just uploading such information on the insight portal of the department. It […]

Madras HC's Order In the Case of R.Ramesh vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer

Madras HC Permits Last Opportunity to Explain Mismatch B/W GST Returns Forms 3B and 9C

The Madras High Court in a mismatch between the GST Returns 3B and the GSTR 9C, has granted a last chance to explain the discrepancies to the petitioner on 25% pre-deposit of the disputed tax. The applicant R.Ramesh is a contractor for distinct Tamil Nadu Government departments and registered under the GST act, submitted returns, […]

Ghanyashyam Anil Dhanani

SC Overturns HC Order on Section 148A(b) Notice to Deceased, Shifts Onus to Legal Representatives

An Order passed by the Bombay High Court regarding the issuance of Notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the legal representatives of a deceased taxpayer has been set aside by the Supreme Court of India. A Civil Appeal was instituted to the Supreme Court by Ghanyashyam Anil Dhanani concerning a […]

MP HC's Order in the Case of M/s Anand Steel Trade Name vs. Union of India and Others

MP HC: Double Penalty for Late GST Returns Filing as ‘Arbitrary and Capricious’

It was carried by the Madhya Pradesh High Court that the GST department may not unfairly prejudice the taxpayer via disallowing the Input tax credit (ITC) quoting the late returns post already imposing late fees for the belated Goods and Services Tax (GST) Returns filing. The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently made a ruling on […]

Madras HC's Order In Case of M/s.Sugos Steel Traders vs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC)

Madras HC Directs Petitioner for 25% Pre-Deposit, Treats Impugned GST Order as SCN for Fresh Hearing

A Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) assessment order has been set aside by the Madras High Court pertinent to the fiscal year 2020-2021, asking for a fresh hearing in matters engaging the discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A returns. The court marked that neither the answer furnished nor the tax filed emerged from the […]

IRFC Gets ₹231-Crore GST Demand Notice from Tamil Nadu Tax Authority

Tamil Nadu GST Authority Issues Tax Demand Notice to Indian Railway Finance Corporation (IRFC)

Indian Railway Finance Corp. received a goods and services tax demand order totaling Rs 230.55 crore via the Tamil Nadu tax authority. The notice furnished via the assistant commissioner from the sales tax division in Chennai North includes a tax demand of Rs 209.59 crore and a penalty of Rs 20.96 crore, IRFC mentioned in […]

Madras HC's Order in the Case of Sri Murugan Typewriting Institute vs. The Deputy Commissioner (CT)

Madras HC: Excess Tax Payments Can Be Adjusted Against GST Pre-Deposit for Final Hearing

The Madras High Court in a ruling carried that the filed amount in excess of the admitted tax obligations can be adjusted against the pre-deposit need for a final hearing chance in Goods and Services Tax (GST) disputes. The applicant, Sri Murugan Typewriting Institute, is in teaching typewriting services and registered under the GST Act, […]

Delhi HC's Order In the Case of M/S Adma Solutions Pvt. Ltd.(Formeri.Y Known As M/S Infovision Information Services Pvt.Ltd.) vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Delhi HC: Penalty for TDS Violations and SCN Issues from Previous Name Company Can Be Rectified u/s 292-B

It was mentioned by the Delhi HC that the wrong citing of the name of the taxpayer in the notice issued to it for the default in deduction of tax at source is just a clerical error. Therefore a division bench of Justices Yashwant Varma and Ravinder Dudeja carried that Show Cause Notice (SCN) along […]

Jaipur ITAT's Order in Case of Suwalka and Suwalka Properties and Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax

ITAT Jaipur: IT Section 68 Provisions Do Not Apply to Sale Transactions Already Credited in the P&L

It was ruled by ITAT Jaipur that provisions of 68 or such are not been applied on the transaction sale recorded in the books of accounts as the sale transactions are part of the income which is credited in the statement of profit & loss account. Case Facts AO in the assessment proceedings noted that […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software