• twitter-icon

Search results for: Section 143(3)

Jharkhand HC's Order for Pralay Pal

JH HC: Tax Penalty Order Set Aside Results in Automatic Dismissal of Case U/S 276C(1)

In its recent ruling, the Jharkhand High Court has furled that when a penalty order is overruled, it will be assumed that there was no concealment of income, resulting in the automatic decline of prosecution under Section 276C(1) of the Income Tax Act. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, in his judgment, highlights that based on previous […]

Delhi ITAT's Order for Swar Maya Infotech P. Ltd

ITAT Order to Re-determine as FMS’s Income Eligible for Deductions Under Business Income

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in reclassifying the rental income as business income and unilaterally disallowing income tax deduction without any justification, according to the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Hence restore the case to the file of the Assessing Officer for redetermination of taxable income under the proper head. […]

Allahabad HC's Order for M/S M.L. Chains

Allahabad HC: INR 10K Penalty on Tax Authority for Cancellation Earlier Order U/S 263

The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000 on an Income Tax Department officer for not adhering to the natural justice while terminating the previous Assessment Order and initiating fresh proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner’s assessment was conducted under Section 143(3) of the Income […]

Lucknow ITAT's Order for Shiva Goods Carrier Pvt. Ltd

ITAT: Not Proves Unexplained Cash If Deposited via Company’s Bank Accounts During Notebandi

The cash deposited via bank accounts of companies at the time of the demonetization is not unexplained cash, the Lucknow bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) stated. Under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the taxpayer Shiva Goods Carrier Pvt. Ltd assessment order was passed in which the total income of […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order for M/s Grasim Industries Ltd.

Mumbai ITAT: Interest Subsidy via TUFS Not Liable Under Income Tax

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently ruled that the interest subsidy provided through the Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme is not liable to be taxed as income. According to the bench comprising Kuldip Singh (Judicial Member) and Prashant Maharishi (Accountant Member), even though the interest subsidy received under the technology […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order for Zainul Abedin Ghaswala

ITAT Permits Deduction U/S 54F as Doesn’t Proof Assessee’s Ownership without Evidence

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has granted approval for a deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, taking into account that the assessee is not the exclusive owner of multiple residential properties used by other family members. According to the bench of judges, Kavitha Rajagopal and Om Prakash […]

No Tax Penalty U/S 271 (1) When Income Surrendered During Investigation

ITAT: No Tax Penalty Can be Applied When Income Surrendered During Investigation U/S 271 (1)

In an appeal filed before it the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has recently, stated that no penalty under section 271 (1) can be levied if the when income submitted via taxpayer in the investigation would have been shown in the regular income tax return filed within the due date. Ahmedabad ITAT witnessed […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order for Parabada Co-op. Milk Producers

Ahmedabad ITAT Cancels Tax Deduction U/S 80P Due to Late ITR Filing

In a recent decision, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad disallowed a deduction under Section 80P because of the late submission of the return. The assessee, Parabada Co-op. Milk Producers Society Limited, a Co-operative Milk Producers Society, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2019–20 on November 5, 2019, exceeding the extended due […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order for Sylvannus Builders and Developers Ltd.

ITAT Ahmedabad Removes Addition as Income Estimated Using Profit Margin Process

While upholding the addition, the Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that A.O. did not reject the books of accounts under Section 145 but instead assessed the income on the basis of the Profit Margin Method. While dismissing the department’s arguments, the T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member) and Waseem Ahmed (Accountant […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software