• twitter-icon

Search results for: Assessing Officer

Pune ITAT's Order In Case of T and T Infra Limited Vs ACIT

Pune ITAT: Tax Deduction Can Be Claimed u/s 80IA If the Entity Operates, Develops, and Maintains Infra

Directing to the decision of CIT vs. ABG Heavy Industries Ltd. (2010) 322 ITR 323, the Pune ITAT repeated that an enterprise can claim deduction under section 80IA if it develops, operates, and maintains the infrastructure facility, subject to the beginning of operation & maintenance of the infrastructure facility after April 01, 1995. The Bench […]

Karnataka HC's Order in the Case of M/s Travacore Minerals and Transport Company Vs State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC Allows ITC Due to Lack of Proper Hearing and Justifiable Reasons Under GST Rule 86A

The Karnataka High Court in a ruling quashes the blocking of Input tax credit (ITC) via the tax authorities by not furnishing a proper hearing or establishing effective reasons. The applicants’ Input Tax Credit (ITC) was blocked through the impugned order at Annexure – A on 09.07.2024, via invoking Rule 86A of the Central Goods […]

High-Risk Tax Refund Claims Under CBDT Scanner

Income Tax Department Sets Sights on High-Risk Refund Claims

There shall be a systematic verification of high-risk refund claims in income tax returns for the AY 2024-25 (financial year ending March 31, 2024), following a standard operating procedure (SOP). the purpose is to find out if the wrong refund claim has been incurred in an organized way or via a single person. As per […]

Chennai ITAT's Order In Case of M/s V.V. Titanium Pigments Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT

Chennai ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Order Due to Incomplete Tax Evidence and Accounting Manipulation

The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) supported the ruling of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) concerning accounting manipulation and tax evasion due to insufficient evidence. An appeal for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 has been furnished by the revenue appellant against the CIT(A) order on March 5, 2024, related to the assessment incurred […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in the Case of Bhartiya Samruddhi Investments and Consulting Services Limited Vs. ACIT

Delhi ITAT Quashes Reassessment, Rules Section 147 Cannot Be Invoked for Mere Change of Opinion

The reassessment of the assessee has been quashed by the Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), which held that an assessment u/s 147 of the I-T Act,1961 cannot be reopened based on mere modification of opinion. Bhartiya Samruddhi Investments and Consulting Services Limited, the appellant-assessee, asserted ₹91,47,928 as ‘sundry advances/assets written […]

MP HC's Order In Case of Birla Corporation Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

MP HC: Non-functionality of Income Tax TRACES Portal Cannot Be Used to Deny the Assessee’s Benefit

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has stated that the non-operation of the Income Tax Department’s TRACES Portal cannot justify refusing an assessee the benefits provided under the Income Tax Act of 1961. A division bench of Justices Vivek Rusia and Anuradha Shukla carried that an assessee’ TDS refund cannot be rejected only on the ground […]

Delhi ITAT's Order In the Case of Natraj Products P. Ltd Vs. ITO

Delhi ITAT Cancels Tax Notice U/S 148 Due to Mechanical Approval by the PCIT for Reassessment

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) of Delhi in a decision, quashed a reassessment notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ITA) to the assessee/ appellant, Natraj Products Pvt. Ltd. for the AY 2010-11, mentioning mechanical approval granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT). The reassessment was on the grounds […]

Chhattisgarh HC's Order in the Case of Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan Vs. The Income Tax Officer

Chhattisgarh HC: Unexplained Deposits in Bank Accounts Will Be Considered Income U/S 68 and 69A

The Chhattisgarh High Court carried an ex-parte assessment u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against a taxpayer who failed to take part in assessment proceedings or describe the cash deposit source of ₹11,44,070 in his bank account. The bench Justices Sanjay K Agrawal and Amitendra Kishore Prasad remarked that under sections 68 and […]

Chandigarh ITAT's Order In Case of Smt. Anita Sandhu vs The ITO

Chandigarh ITAT Permits FTC as Petitioner Filed Form 67 with ITR on Time

The Chandigarh bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) asked the Assessing Officer ( AO ) to allow the Foreign Tax Credit ( FTC ) as Form 67 was filed on the extended due date along with the Income Tax Return (ITR). Towards the matter, the taxpayer Anita Sandhu, had furnished the […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software