Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
The Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, ruled that issuance of summons is not initiation of proceedings referable to under Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act. The bench of Justice Pankaj Bhandari and Justice Shubha Mehta noted that the extent of Section 6(2)(b) and Section 70 of the CGST Act is different and distinct, since the […]
In the matter of Meyer Organics Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, the Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) furnished an important decision for levying the penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The ruling of the tribunal is on the correction of bona fide glitches in the original return in the assessment proceedings. Detailed […]
The Revenue Authorities needed to tax the correct person accurately and will not disallow the eligible deductions on mere technicalities, New Delhi ITAT stressed. The Bench of M. Balaganesh (Accountant Member) and Yogesh Kumar U.S (Judicial Member) followed that “the Revenue has rejected the plea of the Assessee based on mere technicalities and it is […]
Mopidevi Venkata Ramana Rao, former Minister of Andhra Pradesh and current Member of Parliament, addresses a critical problem troubling businesses in India. In a letter to Hon’ble Finance Minister Nirmala Sitaraman, he advocates for the resolution of challenges surrounding Section 16(4) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Andhra Pradesh Tax Practitioners and […]
The Madras High Court ruled the Assessing Officer (AO) to permit the transitional credit of purchase tax paid under Section 140 of the TNGST Act, 2017, if the applicant had paid “purchase tax” under Section 12(1) of the TNVAT Act. The bench of Justice C. Saravanan noted that the applicant deserves an opportunity to safeguard […]
The decision of the Gujarat High Court, on a special civil application, while highlighting the binding nature of its directions on respondent authorities, remarked that once the Court furnishes the directions, it holds authority over the respondent authorities, and therefore, the respondent authorities are liable to comply with the directions that the Court issues when […]
The Delhi High Court ruled that GST registration could not get cancelled just because an assessee does not file returns for a certain duration. The Petitioner stopped the business on the father’s demise. The retrospective cancellation of the registration consequence in the rejection of the ITC for a particular duration. Raghav Arora, the applicant contested […]
The two parallel proceedings towards the same period are not permissible under the CGST/SGST Act, Gauhati High Court ruled. Section 6 of the CGST/SGST Act, specifically Section 6(2), suggests that once a proceeding is started in either of the two Acts, another proceeding for the same period under the other Act cannot be initiated, the […]
In the case of Global Calcium (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) [Writ Petition No. 170 of 2024 dated February 01, 2024], the Hon’ble Madras High Court ruled that the Assessing Officer should acknowledge the pertinent elements before passing any order. Thus, the case was remanded back to the Assessing Officer. Facts About Global Calcium […]
