• twitter-icon

Search results for: gst

Calcutta HC's Order In Case of Bajaj Wheels Private Limited vs. Union of India

Calcutta HC Sends Back Bajaj’s Appeal to GST Authority Over ITC Legality Lapse

The Calcutta High Court, after discovering that the authority had not been able to analyse the legality of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed, remanded the appeal of Bajaj Wheels to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) adjudicating authority. By keeping the case pending, no effective objective shall be served, the court cited. The applicant, […]

Madras HC's Order In Case of M/s. Pioneer Products vs The State Tax Officer (FAC)

Madras HC: Reminder Notice Mandatory Before Ex-Parte GST Order U/S 169

The tax authority should send at least one reminder notice via Registered Post Acknowledgement Due (RPAD) or any other valid mode as specified u/s 169 of the GST (Goods and Services Tax ) Act, the Madras High Court ruled before passing an ex-parte order. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, on June 11, 2025, furnished the ruling quashed […]

Gujarat HC's Order in The Case of Messrs Addwrap Packaging PVT. LTD. & ANR. vs. Union of India & ORS

Gujarat HC: Omission of GST Rule 96(10) Applies Prospectively to All Pending Proceedings

The Gujarat High Court has ruled that a specific rule in the tax regulations, known as Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017, will apply going forward, but can also be used in current cases that are still being processed. The Division Bench of Justices Bhargav D. Karia and D.N. Ray on the issue said […]

Jharkhand HC's Order In Case of M/s. R.K. Transport & Constructions Limited vs. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC Acts Against Supplier for GSTR-1 Non-Filing and Non-Remittance of GST Collections

The Jharkhand High Court held that the State GST authorities are duty-bound under Section 76 of the Jharkhand GST Act (JGST), 2017, to initiate action against any person who collects tax but fails to remit it, regardless of whether the supplier is registered under the CGST or JGST. Jurisdictional excuses or supplier defaults cannot result […]

New Corrigendum to the GSTAT (Procedure) Rules, 2025 Issued by MCA

GST Appellate Tribunal Framework: MoF Releases Corrigendum to Rectify G.S.R. 256(E)

A corrigendum has been issued via the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) to the notification G.S.R. 256(E), originally published on April 24, 2025, to improve and cite the norms under the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) framework. Technical errors are being addressed by the revised notification-published as G.S.R. 389(E) in the Gazette […]

Madras HC's Order in Case of Volvo Auto India Private Limited vs. Union of India & Ors

Madras HC Declares GST Extension Notifications Under Section 168A Unconstitutional

The extension GST notification issued under Section 168A of the CGST Act, 2017, which extended the time limit for adjudication, has been quashed by the Madras High Court. The bench of Justice Mohammed Shaffiq ruled that the Notification No. 09/2023 has specified poor in law since its issuance was not occasioned via a force majeure […]

Stakeholders Raise Alarm Over Misuse of GST Audit Notices under Section 74(A)

Stakeholders Flag Misuse of GST Section 74(A) for Routine Audits, Urge Shift to Section 73

Towards the issuance of GST audit scrutiny notices under Section 74(A), tax experts and industry representatives raised concerns regarding bogus practices at the GST conclave, jointly organised by the Central GST (CGST) Ahmedabad Zone and the Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI). The experts mentioned that these notices are to be reserved merely for […]

GST Registration Grievance Helpdesk by CGST Mumbai Zone

Mumbai CGST Introduces Grievance Mechanism to Resolve GST Registration Issues

A devoted Grievance Redressal Mechanism has been launched by the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) and Central Excise, Mumbai Zone to support the taxpayers in encountering problems during Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration. Under the Central jurisdiction, the applicants who are facing delays or issues can provide their grievances through email at reg-cgstmz@gov.in. […]

Bombay HC's Order In Case of Skytech Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner of State Tax Nodal

Bombay HC: Cash Credit Account Not Subject to Attachment as Property Under GST Section 83

A cash credit account cannot be treated as the property of the account holder, which can be considered u/s 83 of the GST Act, the Bombay High Court mentioned. The Division Bench of High Court Justices Jitendra Jain and M.S. Sonak noted that the phrase ‘including bank account’ follows the phrase “any property” shall be […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates