Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
The decision of the Gujarat High Court, on a special civil application, while highlighting the binding nature of its directions on respondent authorities, remarked that once the Court furnishes the directions, it holds authority over the respondent authorities, and therefore, the respondent authorities are liable to comply with the directions that the Court issues when […]
The Madras High Court ruled that Ao’s classification of Harpic and Lizol under the 28% GST slab rate is without consideration. The bench of Justice Mohammed Shaffiq noted that when complaints are raised, a duty is cast on the assessing authority to apply its mind to the objections and deal with each one of them. […]
The Bombay High Court discussed a petition for the rectification of Form GSTR-1 for the fiscal year 2017-2018. The applicant, NRB Bearings Ltd., sought revisions to correct clerical errors and enable the claiming of the input tax credit (ITC) amounting to Rs. 64,36,188. Detailed Analysis in the Case of NRB Bearings Ltd NRB Bearings Ltd. […]
The Delhi High Court ruled that GST registration could not get cancelled just because an assessee does not file returns for a certain duration. The Petitioner stopped the business on the father’s demise. The retrospective cancellation of the registration consequence in the rejection of the ITC for a particular duration. Raghav Arora, the applicant contested […]
The two parallel proceedings towards the same period are not permissible under the CGST/SGST Act, Gauhati High Court ruled. Section 6 of the CGST/SGST Act, specifically Section 6(2), suggests that once a proceeding is started in either of the two Acts, another proceeding for the same period under the other Act cannot be initiated, the […]
In the case of Global Calcium (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) [Writ Petition No. 170 of 2024 dated February 01, 2024], the Hon’ble Madras High Court ruled that the Assessing Officer should acknowledge the pertinent elements before passing any order. Thus, the case was remanded back to the Assessing Officer. Facts About Global Calcium […]
The Delhi High Court ruled that (GST) registration could not be cancelled just because an assessee does not file returns for a certain duration. On the demise of the father of the Petitioner, the applicant has discontinued the business. The retrospective cancellation of the registration consequence in the refusal of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) […]
The order by the GST and Central Excise Superintendent for lack of jurisdiction is been quashed by the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court. The bench of Justice Alok Mathur sees that as per the circular, February 9, 2018 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, and Department of Revenue, the power of […]
As a taxpayer has not filed the GST returns for a certain duration does not imply that the registration of the assesses is required to be cancelled with a retrospective date also covering the period when the returns were filed and the assessee was compliant, Justices Sanjeev Sachdeva and Ravindra Dudeja noted. The Delhi High […]
