• twitter-icon

Search results for: section 54

Jodhpur ITAT's Order In the Case of M/s Jain Natural Pickles Private Limited vs ACIT

Jodhpur ITAT Permits Rectification Under Section 154 for Inadvertent Double Taxation Errors

The ITAT Jodhpur has ruled that rectification under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is allowable where an inadvertent mistake in tax return filing results in double taxation of the same income. The appellant, M/s Jain Natural Pickles Private Limited, encountered a survey u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, during which […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order in the Case of Neetaben Snehalkumar Patel Vs. ITO

Ahmedabad ITAT: IT Section 254(2) Only Allows Rectification of Mistakes, Not Recalling or Reviewing Orders

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has said that the provision of Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 could not be utilized for a recall and analysis order by the tribunal. It is believed that the aforesaid provision has the objective to rectify the mistake seen from the […]

Delhi HC's Order in the Case of Bhupender Kumar vs Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & ORS

Retrospective GST Penalty Valid If SCN Issued: Delhi High Court on Section 122(1A)

The Delhi High Court held that Section 122(1A) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, can be applied retrospectively, provided that a show cause notice had been issued to the taxpayer when the provision was introduced. Section 122 contemplates penalties for offences under the GST Act, along with the bogus claim of ITC. The […]

MCA’s Order for M/s Nandaka Information Services Private Limited

MCA Slaps Penalty on Company for Breach of Section 12 of the Companies Act

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed fines on Nandaka Information Services Private Limited and its leaders because they did not keep a registered office as required by law. This is in line with Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013, which states that companies must have an official office address. The Registrar of Companies […]

Madras HC'S Order in The Case of M/s. G.P. Construction vs. The Commissioner

Madras HC: Interest Under Section 50(1) CGST/TNGST Justify for Delayed GST Remittance

The High Court of Madras has upheld the imposition of interest under Section 50(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) and Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax (TNGST) Act, 2017, in conjunction with Rule 88B, for individuals and businesses that make delayed tax payments. This ruling emphasises the importance of timely compliance with […]

Kerala HC's Order In Case of the Salim Aboobacker vs. ITO

Kerala HC: Section 148A Proceedings Invalid If Income Escaped Is Under ₹50 Lakh and Notice Is Beyond 3-Year Limit

The Kerala High Court ruled that tax proceedings under Income Tax Section 148A are invalid if the income is less than INR 50 lakh and the notice is issued more than three years later. Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. said that “when the order of the assessing authority is found to be without jurisdiction and hit […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in The Case of Ashok Kumar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(5)

ITAT Delhi: Tax Deduction U/S 54F Not Allowed for Property Bought in Mother’s Name

The Delhi Bench of the ITAT decided that a taxpayer could not claim a tax deduction for buying a house because the property was registered in their mother’s name An individual taxpayer, Ashok Kumar, has faced scrutiny for the AY 2015-16. An income tax return (ITR) has been furnished by the taxpayer specifying an income […]

Jharkhand HC's Order in The Case of M/s New Punjab Motor Transport vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax

Jharkhand HC Quashes ITAT Order on Section 40(a)(ia) Based on Overruled SC Precedent

The Jharkhand High Court has overturned a decision made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Circuit Bench in Ranchi. The Court found that the Tribunal’s ruling relied on an earlier case that has since been dismissed by the Supreme Court. Earlier, the whole addition of the Assessing officer has been removed by the tribunal […]

Madras HC's Order in Case of The Assistant Commissioner of Customs vs. M/s.Modern India Products

Madras HC: IGST Refund Claim Valid Alongside Duty Drawback Under Sections 74 & 75

The Hon’ble Madras High Court of Madurai Bench in the case of M/s Modern India Products v. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs House IGST Section & Ors. [Writ Appeal (MD) No. 1559 of 2021 dated February 21, 2025], has permitted the refund claim via the taxpayer of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (“the IGST”) […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software