Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
It was mentioned by the Gujarat High Court that there cannot be any income escapement from the taxpayer if there is no unexplained amount in the bank statement on record. The Bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Mauna M. Bhatt noted that “the reason given by the Assessing Officer for alleged escapement of Rs.3,25,00,000/- […]
The petition of the taxpayer ruling has been permitted by the Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which collected income could be applied to the acquisition of the fixed assets u/s 11(6) of the Income Tax Act,1961. Gujarat Safety Council, the appellant-assessee, was a trust that led safety training programs. It filed a […]
Acknowledging the hardship being faced by the exporters as of restriction concerning the refund on exports, the 54th GST Council Meeting as a trade facilitation measure, recommended omission of Rule 96(10), rule 89(4A) & rule 89(4B) from CGST Rules, 2017 prospectively, where the advantage of the specified concessional/ exemption notifications is taken on the inputs. […]
Tax deduction u/s 54 of Income Tax Act 1961 ( ITA ) is permissible even if proceeds from the sale of old property are not reinvested in the acquisition of new asset/property, the Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled. The taxpayer, Jignesh Jaysukhlal, owns a residential property, which he decided to sell. […]
The deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act on the construction of the new dwelling/residential unit has been permitted by the Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The bench of Aby T. Varkey (Judicial Member) and Amitabh Shukla (Accountant Member) has marked that the taxpayer had released the burden to prove […]
In DCIT vs. Sandeep Hooda, adjudicated by ITAT Delhi, the taxpayer’s eligibility for deduction u/s 54 of the I-T Act, 1961, is scrutinized. The dispute emerges from the absence of essential amenities in the claimed residential property. The case background is that the taxpayer, Sandeep Hooda, qualifies for tax deduction u/s 54 despite the shortage […]
The Allahabad High Court ruled that the purpose of evading tax is an essential condition for levying penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008. Section 54(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 furnishes for circumstances under which penalties can be charged to taxpayers. It is furnished that […]
The New Delhi ITAT after determining that the taxpayer does not file either of the conditions specified in section 54 of the income tax, ruled that no infirmity in the IT authority’s order in refusing the advantage of the deduction of the long-term capital gains to the taxpayer under section 54. The Division Bench of […]
The Delhi High Court was directed to apply for a refund mandated under section 54 of the Central Goods and Service Tax ( CGST ) Act, 2017 for a refund of GST paid. The court removes the period between 19.01.2024 and the date of judgment for limitation. The applicant, Pedersen Consultants India Pvt Ltd, asks […]
