Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
The Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) Maharashtra came up with a ruling that clarifies that immovable properties with no distinct goods and services will attract Work Contracts. The said ruling comes into a case where Prasa Infocom & Power Solutions Private Limited is the applicant. And it is engaged in the business of providing data […]
Government has introduced many tax rules for the NRIs (Non-Resident Indians) who wants to sell their property in the country. But the tax is applied as per the status of the residence and the ownership of the property. As per the Income Tax Department rules, tax is not levied on the heritage property in India […]
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) announced that the disclosure of the acquisition cost of all the assets like land, building and jewellery is mandatory, via each and every assessee, who have annual income above Rs 50 lakh amount, in the Income Tax return forms for assessment year 2016-17.
In the matter of Shamanna Reddy vs. ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore addressed a petition against the order of CIT(A) for the AY 2018-19. The petitioner, an individual, challenged the dismissal of their petition via the CIT(A) on technical foundations, and the following assessment order passed u/s 147 read with section 144 […]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the addition could not be deleted for the only cause that the section under which the addition is made is cited incorrectly and that it is essential to look into the merits of the case. The bench of Anikesh Banerjee (Judicial Member) and Padmavathy […]
The Chennai ITAT said that receipt of sale consideration of a massive amount of Rs. 1.60 Crores in cash, which is, in breach of the provisions of section 269SS (this section restricts cash receipts over & above twenty thousand) of the Income-tax Act, rightly merits the imposition of penalty under section 271D. The Bench of […]
On discovering that the need of application of mind is not in the instant case, the Delhi ITAT ruled that the reassessment incurred in section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is poor in law and therefore, the re-assessment order is suppressed. ITAT said that no independent application of mind […]
The assessment reopening was based on a revision of the view of the AO (Assessing Officer) from that ruled before at the time of assessment proceedings. The revision of the view does not comprise the justification to assume that the income levied to tax has escaped from assessment, the Bombay High Court ruled. The bench […]
The Delhi bench of the ITAT recently made a significant ruling. It said that individuals can claim deductions for capital gains, even if they haven’t deposited into a capital gain account scheme. The case involved assessee, Sarita Gupta, a resident individual, of whom information was received by the Assessing Officer that the assessee’s dad sold […]
