• twitter-icon

Search results for: ITAT Pune

Mumbai ITAT's Order In Case of Shri Ajit Chandrashekar Dighe Vs DCIT

ITAT Mumbai: Form 16 or 26 AS Important for Claiming TDS Credit

The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) demanded re-adjudication, commenting that either Form 26AS or Form 16 is crucial to claim the Tax Deducted at Source ( TDS ) credit. The taxpayer claimed TDS amounting to Rs.10,45,439 was deducted by the employer i.e. M/s. Nirmal Lifestyle Ltd. from salary u/s […]

Kolkata ITAT's Order for Jankalyan Vinimay Pvt. Ltd

Kolkata ITAT: Can’t Claim Tax Deduction for Unpaid Employee Contributions (PF & ESI) to Account

The Kolkata ITAT learning that the taxpayer’s returns have been processed in the Computer Processing Centre held that when the auditors have reported in the audit report that employees’ contributions have been deducted by the taxpayer from the employee’s salaries but not deposited within the deadline furnished under PF&ESI Act, assessee could not avail for […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order for Shri Ajit Chandrashekar Dighe

Mumbai ITAT: Assessee Must Submit Form 26AS or 16 to Verify TDS Credit Claim on Non-Granting

During remanding the case back for re-adjudication, the Mumbai ITAT stated that the prima facie onus shall be on the taxpayer to verify its claim of non-granting of TDS credit, by furnishing pertinent documents, like an appointment letter, salary slips or Form No.16 or bank statements, or any other corroborative evidence/ documents. The Bench of […]

Pune ITAT's Order Sudha Karbhari Nagre

ITAT: Assessee Fails to Include Income on Sale of Residential Property Either in Original ITR or Response to Notice U/S 148

The Pune division of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision to include the taxpayer’s unreported income from the sale of residential property in both the original ITR (Income Tax Return) and the return filed in response to a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In the relevant assessment […]

Pune ITAT's Order for Garve Motors Private Limited

ITAT: Re-adjudication to AO for Disallowance Made Basis of Absence of Business Vouchers

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), the Pune Bench ordered the Assessing Officer to re-adjudicate against the disallowance made for the reason of the non-submission of business vouchers. The appellant, Garve Motors Private Limited is an authorised dealer of Hyundai Cars and is a private limited company. The Assessing Officer reproduced the specifics of the […]

Pune ITAT's Order for Deepak Shriniwas Mantri

ITAT Instructs Commissioner to Adjudicate the Manual Appeal, Assessee Doesn’t Know e-Filing Process

The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) chaired by R.S. Syal (VP) rendered that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) adjudicate the petition furnished manually since they rejected the filed petition via the taxpayer on the cause that the same does not file electronically. Though the need for e-filing of the appeals […]

Pune ITAT's Order for Anil Ratanlal Bohora

ITAT: Husband Permitted for TDS Credit on Interest from Amount Granted to His Wife

The husband would be qualified for taking the credit of TDS on the interest made on the amount gifted to his wife, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT), Pune Bench ruled. The two-member bench of R.S. Syal (Vice President) and S.S. Viswanethra Ravi (Judicial Member) ruled that assessability is there in the hands of somebody other […]

Cuttack ITAT'S Order for Rajdhani Institute of Information Technology

ITAT Cuttack: Intimation U/S 143(1) Not Logical for Defective ITR

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cuttack Bench, has ruled in an appeal that an income tax return submitted with an error and subsequent notification u/s.143(1) is invalid. ITAT made the mentioned observation when an appeal was filed before it through the taxpayer, as against the order of the CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), […]

ITAT's Order for Sikandar And Company

ITAT: Authority Can’t Open Assessment Without Tangible Proof of Income

A Single Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune, ruled that the Assessing Officer (AO) cannot reopen an assessment without tangible material showing escapement of income. The taxpayer is the owner of Sikandar and Company a company that incurs the income from trading on the wholesale and semi-wholesale basis and Cattle feed items. […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software