• twitter-icon

Search results for: 74

Allahabad High Court's Order for M/S Abhay Traders

HC: GST SCN Must Have Foundation of the Case on Which Action is Required

A show cause notice should comprise the foundation of the case laid on which the action would be important, ruled by the Allahabad High Court. The taxpayer would have the remedy to file answers/objections toward the related authorities in case the show cause notice is sufficient. There would be two major needs of the principles […]

Delhi High Court's Order for Kritika Agarwal

Delhi HC: No Cancellation of a GSTIN on the Mere Instructions of Different Authority

The High Court of Delhi in the case of Kritika Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ORS. has ruled that GST Number cannot be cancelled just on the grounds of the direction of another authority. The petitioner is primarily aggrieved over her GST Registration cancellation. The petitioner has also requested reimbursement of Rs. 20,00,000 (Rupees […]

No Tax Liability by 70% Income Tax Return Filers in FY23

FM: Approx 70% Income Tax Filers Report Zero Tax Liability in FY 2022-23

Approx 70% of taxpayers who filed income tax returns in FY23 reported zero tax liability, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman presented the data to the Parliament in writing in response to a question. According to the data, 74 million people submitted income tax returns in FY23, while 51.6 million declared zero tax liability. This accounts for […]

Delhi HC's Order for M/s Metal Edge

Delhi HC: GST Officials to Review GSTIN Cancellation Order as Not Issued by Authorized Officer

The Delhi High Court Division Bench, in a Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration cancellation petition, ordered the petitioner to get a re-examination from authorities. The petitioner a sole proprietor of M/s Metal Edge, challenged a decision where the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled. The petitioner asserted that respondent no. 1 (Sales Tax Officer Class […]

Bombay HC's Orders for Media Net Software Services (India) Pvt. Ltd

Bombay HC: State GST Authorities Can’t Own Tax Amount on Export Transactions

In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court declared that CGST/MGST authorities would not have the authority to keep the sum of tax on export transactions. The two-member bench comprising Justice G.S. Kulkarni and Justice Jitendra S. Jain has instructed the state government to transact the sum to the Central Government. The petitioner needed to […]

Gujarat High Court's Order for Nirajkumar Nareshkumar Lakhyani

Gujarat HC: Assessee Can Pay Pending GST Liabilities in Installments

The Gujarat High Court overruled the Adjudicating Authority’s ruling and allowed an assessee to pay their tax debt in instalments, therefore releasing the provisional attachment of the taxpayer’s bank account. The aforesaid order which Justice NV Anjaria and Devan M Desai delivered would come in response to the special civil application in which the applicant […]

Delhi ITAT's Order for M/s. Candor Gurgaon Two Developers & Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi ITAT: Rental Income from Car Parking is Deductible U/S 80IA of I-T Act

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), the Delhi bench, has held that income derived from car parking is liable for deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act 1961. The assessee, Candor Gurgaon Two Developers & Projects Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in the business of developing SEZ in the IT/ITES Sector and lease-out the […]

Bombay High Court's Order for Sunlight Cable Industries

Bombay HC Permits IGST Refund with Interest Rate of 7% on Zero-rated Supplies U/S 16(3)

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the IGST (Integrated Goods and Services Tax) paid on zero-rated supplies will be refunded to the petitioner along with 7% interest. A two-member bench consisting of Justice G.S. Kulkarni and Justice Jitendra Jain have determined that the petitioner has the right to claim a refund for the IGST […]

Bombay HC's Order for Bharat Parihar

Bombay HC: Provisional Attachment of Bank Account is Illegal After 1 Year Under GST

GST provisional attachment order is invalid post 1 year, Bombay High Court ruled. On 21st April 2022, the communication provisionally attaching the applicant’s bank account would be made illegal and is invalid by virtue of the provisions of Section 83(2) of the CGST Act. On 19th April 2023, the extension of the provisional attachment by […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates