• twitter-icon

Search results for: gst

New Delhi GSTAT's Order In Case of Gopal Teknocon Pvt. Ltd. vs. DGAP

GSTAT New Delhi: No Action Should Be Taken Once a Contractor Deposits GST ITC Benefit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench at New Delhi, has ruled that when a contractor voluntarily remits the residual input tax credit (ITC) advantage determined via the Directorate General of Anti‑Profiteering (DGAP) to its principal, no separate anti-profiteering action is needed under section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax […]

Allahabad HC's Order in The Case of M/s S.A. Iron & Alloys Pvt. Ltd vs. State of U.P. and 4 Other

Allahabad HC: GST Section 74 Requires Fraud Proof, Orders Refund with 4% Interest

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) Department cannot invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act in the absence of findings of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts with intent to evade tax. The appellate order’s part has been quashed by the court that kept the […]

Delhi HC's Order in The Case Of M/S Ganga Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Delhi East Commissionerate

Missing Personal Hearing Costs Senior Citizen ₹1 Lakh, Rules Delhi HC in ₹1.95 Crore GST Case

One more chance needs to be provided to a septuagenarian woman, who failed to appear for a personal hearing relating to a ₹1,95,11,160 demand raised against her firm, the Delhi High Court asked the Customs Department. The applicant is the sole proprietor of the firm, who has a dealership agreement with M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation […]

Delhi HC: GST Proceedings U/S 74(5) Can Be Closed After Tax Payment With 15% Pre-SCN

Delhi HC: GST Proceedings U/S 74(5) Can Be Closed After Tax Payment With 15% Pre-SCN

The Delhi High Court allowed Delhi Sales Corporation to pay a fine u/s 74(5) related to the Goods and Services Tax, even after they had received a SCN notice U/S 74(8) asking them to explain why they should not be penalised. A panel of judges, Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Shail Jain, noted that the […]

Allahabad HC's Order in The Case of M/S Vimlesh Kumar Contractor vs. State of U.P. and 3 others

Allahabad HC: No GST Can Be Levied on Paid Post-GST Payments for VAT-Era Works

A significant ruling by the Allahabad High Court has clarified that GST authorities do not have the power to initiate proceedings under Section 73 to levy tax on payments received post-GST if the work was actually completed during the VAT regime. The Context: In this specific case, the petitioner, who works under a work contract, […]

Madras High Court Order in The Case of Tvl. Bernard Karuthudaiyan vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer

Madras HC: Belated GST Return Filing Automatically Nullifies Sec. 62 Assessment

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has determined that a best judgment assessment issued to a non-filer under Section 62 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, is automatically withdrawn upon the submission of a valid return by the registered taxpayer, regardless of whether this submission occurs beyond the stipulated […]

Delhi HC's Order In the Case of M/s Arjun Engineering Co. vs. Additional Commissioner of GST

Delhi HC Allows Tax Relief to Assessee Over GST Mismatch in GSTR-3B, GSTR-2A, and GSTR-1

A company named M/s Arjun Engineering Co. submitted the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the Delhi High Court, against the Additional Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax, North Delhi. On November 22, 2025, the case was determined. The hearing was accomplished in hybrid mode, i.e., both online and offline. […]

Allahabad HC's Order in The Case of M/s Prostar M Info Systems Limited vs. State of UP and 3 others

Allahabad HC: Goods with Valid GST E-way Bill Cannot Be Detained or Seized

The Allahabad High Court ruled that goods transported with a valid and authentic GST e-way bill cannot be detained or seized. The Court strongly criticised the department for subjecting a registered taxpayer to unnecessary litigation despite full compliance with GST requirements. The applicant, M/s Prostar M Info Systems Limited, is supplying UPS systems, batteries, and […]

Allahabad HC's Order in The Case of Vidyarthi Dresses vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh Through Principal Secretary (Finance) And 2 Others

Allahabad HC: Confiscation (S. 130) Inappropriate for Mere Excess Stock Found in GST Survey

The Allahabad High Court, in a ruling, held that u/s 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the proceedings dealing with confiscation of goods cannot be invoked only because excess stock is encountered in a survey. The court held that where stock discrepancies emerge, the appropriate statutory method is Section 73 or […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates