Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
A reconsideration of the matter has been ordered by Madras HC on a 10% pre-deposit condition concerned with the mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A, following a failure to respond to the Show Cause Notice ( SCN ). The applicant, Crystal Granites contested the order because the show cause notice and the impugned order […]
The Kerala High Court in a case ruled that the advantages of Income tax, 1961 deduction u/s 80(P) were refused because of not furnishing the ITR on the said time. The applicant Muvattupuzha Agricultural Co-Operative Bank Ltd., has furnished the writ petition contesting the assessment order under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act and […]
The Madras High Court in a ruling permitted it to challenge the order on a 10% pre-deposit condition as agreed by the applicant for the case of misplacement of Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) in GSTR-3B. The court also marked the petitioner’s submission that he was not able to respond to notices as uploaded […]
Overview The Madras High Court in a judgment addressed the legality of the provisional property attachment u/s 83 of the CGST Act 2017. The same blog explores the court’s decisions for the matter of TVL Maxtile AAC Block Vs State Tax Officer, stating key aspects of tax demand and recovery procedures. Context We know about […]
The Madras High Court in a ruling held that a new SCN u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 will be issued for the problems not raised before. The department was asked to provide a fresh order u/s 148A(d) after regarding the reply of the taxpayer. A Single bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy held […]
The Madras High Court explained that Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax ( CGST Act ), 2017 does not need the audit report to show the ‘Fraud or Misstatement or Suppression of Facts’ for Demand u/s 74 under the GST Act. A single bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy remarked, that nothing is […]
A 10% pre-deposit for the reconsideration of a case where the petitioner was clueless about Goods and Services Tax (GST) proceedings because of the failure of their GST consultant to inform them about the disparity between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A, as obligated by the Madras High Court in a ruling. The applicant, Muthu Traders […]
The Madras High Court in a ruling held that the Advance tax unutilized under the Value Added Tax (VAT) or Tamil Nadu VAT (TNVAT) has been permitted to be transitioned under Section 140 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TNGST). A Single bench of Justice C. Saravanan, the language of Section […]
The Madras High Court directed reconsidering the issue of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Goods and Services Tax (GST) reversed as of the discrepancy in GSTR 3B returns and GSTR 2A. On the condition of 10% pre-deposit, the order was set aside. The applicant, Rishab Industries is engaged in wholesale and retail trading of plastic […]
