• twitter-icon

Search results for: Bombay High court

SC's Order In the Case of Kanak Impex Ltd. vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

SC Dismisses Special Leave Petition on 100% Tax Addition U/S 69C for Fake Purchases

The Bombay High Court’s ruling has been kept by the Apex court, which restored the assessing officer’s 100% addition of Rs 20.06 crore as fake purchases u/s 69C, dismissing the Special Leave Petition. The court, post-hearing the counsel and analysing the record, does not discover any reason to interrupt with the findings of the High […]

Gujarat HC's Order in The Case of M/S Sanghvi Metal Corporation vs. Union of India & ORS

Gujarat HC Grants Permission to Revise Form GSTR-1 to Correct Turnover Entries

The State Tax officer has issued a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 alleging a difference in outward supplies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. The turnover of its sister concerns has been elaborated by the applicant, who has been incorrectly uploaded in GSTR-1 for December 2017, which has developed the discrepancy. For the ITC mismatches, […]

Punjab & Haryana HC's Order In the Case of Barkha Bansal vs. State of U.T

Punjab & Haryana HC Directs GST Officials to Record Statements on Premises with Counsel Present

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that when someone is called in by the officials from the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI), their statement must be taken during regular working hours and with their lawyer present. The Court also highlighted that the individual has the right to ask for […]

SC's Order in The Case of Shital Fibers Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

SC: Export Profit Deductions U/S 80-HH Can Be Computed Without Reducing Income by 80-IA/80-IB Claims

The Supreme Court, while responding to a reference, ruled that deductions under Sections 80-IA and 80-IB of the Income Tax Act are not required to be reduced from the gross total income before computing deductions under other provisions, such as Section 80-HH for export profits. The verdict was handed by a bench of Justices Abhay […]

Delhi HC's Order In The Case of Gurudas Mallik Thakur vs. Commissioner Of CGST and Anr.

Delhi HC: GST Penalty U/S 122(1A) Can Be Imposed on Any Person (Taxable & Non-Taxable)

The Delhi High Court has decided that anyone, whether they need to pay taxes or not, can face penalties for avoiding the Goods and Services Tax (GST) under section 122(1A) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act from 2017. A division bench of Justices Rajneesh Kumar Gupta and Prathiba M. Singh varied from the […]

GST Notice Issued to University of Mumbai for Tax on Affiliation Fees

University of Mumbai (MU) Receives GST Notice Over Tax on Affiliation Fees

The CGST department of the Maharashtra government has issued a notice to the University of Mumbai (MU), demanding payment of ₹16.9 crore in GST dues dating back to 2017. Additionally, other public universities in the state have received similar notices requiring payment of GST on affiliation fees, applied retroactively. The recent development occurred as the […]

Legal Guide to Challenging GST Bank Attachments

How to Reply to GST Provisional Bank Attachment Notices

In India, the Goods and Service Tax (GST) was introduced for diverse assessment provisions. The tax collection and legislation process. The provisional attachment of bank accounts u/s 83 of the CGST Act 2017 is one of the most controversial parts of GST enforcement. The same blog tries to look into the statutory framework that regulates […]

INR 141.36 Crore GST Penalty Imposed on Vedanta Ltd.

Vedanta Ltd. Faces ₹141.36 Crore Tax Penalty for Alleged Ineligible GST ITC Claims

For allegedly availing ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC), Vedanta Ltd. has been slapped with Goods and Services Tax (GST) penalties totalling ₹141.36 crores. The Mumbai-listed company has received two GST notices demanding the tax amount, applicable interest, and penalties. GST Penalties To contest these orders Vedanta has announced the plans citing that it stayed hopeful […]

Bombay HC's Order in the Case of Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari vs. Union of India

SC: Company Employees Not Liable for GST Penalty Under CGST Act Sections 122(1-A) and 137

The Apex Court of India ruled that the employees of Maersk Line India cannot be held liable for Goods and Services Tax (GST) penalties under Section 122(1-A) and Section 137 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). The Apex Court of India furnished a decision in a Special Leave Petition furnished […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software