• twitter-icon

Search results for: Income tax Act

P&H HC Warns CBDT Over ITR Audit Deadline Delay

P&H High Court Warns CBDT: Extend ITR Audit Deadline or Face Contempt

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has given a warning to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) for not following the order of the High Court on October 13, 2025, which asked for an extension of the income tax return (ITR) filing due date for audited cases. The court said that the continued inaction […]

Hyderabad ITAT's Order in Case of ACE Tyres Private Limited vs. ACIT

Hyderabad ITAT: Seized Material Not ‘Books of Account’ or an ‘Asset’; Notice u/s 148 Invalid

The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal recently cancelled certain tax reassessment actions that had been started for several past years, specifically from 2014 to 2019. These actions were based on specific sections of the Income Tax Act, which deals with how taxes are assessed and reassessed by the government. In simple terms, […]

Chennai ITAT's Order in Case of Thangamuthu Balakrishnan vs. ITO

Chennai ITAT: Non-Faceless Reassessment Notices Under IT Section 148 Not Valid

The bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, held that any reassessment notice issued by a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) after the introduction of the faceless regime is not valid in law. The Tribunal, emphasising the binding nature of the CBDT’s e-Assessment of Income Scheme, 2022, held that the issuance of notices u/s 148 […]

Gujarat HC's Order in the Case of Income Tax Bar Association & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors

Gujarat HC Directs CBDT to Extend ITR Due Date to Nov 30 for Audit Cases

The Gujarat High Court, the apex judicial authority in the state, directed the CBDT to extend the ITR filing deadline for audit cases to November 30, in order to comply with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, which mandate a one-month gap between the filing of the audit report and the ITR. CBDT must […]

Nagpur ITAT's Order in The Case of Somalwar Academy Education Societies Employees Co-op vs. DCIT (CPC)

ITAT Nagpur: Section 80P Deduction Can’t Be Denied Solely for Belated ITR Filing

The deduction under Section 80P cannot be denied for belated ITR filing, the Nagpur bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled and directed the AO to examine the claim and determine the tax liability. The taxpayer Somalwar Academy Education Societies Employees Co-op. Credit Society Mar submitted its income return for the assessment year under […]

Raipur ITAT's Order In Case of Shri Rakesh Kumar vs. Income Tax Officer

Raipur ITAT Dismisses Appeal U/S 271(1)(b) After Appellant Opts for Resolution of DTVSV

The Raipur ITAT has refused an appeal associated with a tax penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. This judgment arrived after the appellant, who appealed, decided to fix their tax issues via the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. Rakesh Kumar, resident of Bhilai, has submitted the appeal against the order […]

Allahabad HC's Order in The Case of Mahesh Gautam vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Allahabad HC: I-T Notices U/S 148 Must Be Personally Served via Speed Post for Valid Service U/S 27

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that notices issued under Sections 148 and 282 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, must be personally served on the assessee through speed post. Simply sending the notice to the assessee’s address does not satisfy the requirement of valid service under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. […]

Chandigarh ITAT's Order In the Case of Shri Devi Dayal vs. ITO

ITAT Condones 38-Day Delay in Filing IT Appeal, Rules Spam Folder a Sufficient Cause

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Chandigarh has recently excused a 38-day delay in filing an appeal, determining that an appellant’s explanation of an order being directed to his email’s spam folder constituted “sufficient cause” under Section 253(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case involved Devi Dayal, a resident of Kaithal, Haryana, […]

Bombay HC's Order in The Case of The Commissioner of Income Tax vs Dr. Balabhai Nanavati Hospital

Bombay HC: Payments to Consultant Doctors Not Considered Salaries, Subject to TDS U/S 194J

The Bombay High Court has clarified that payments made to consultant doctors do not qualify as salary if there is no fixed pay established. Consequently, these payments are subject to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appellant, which is the Revenue, has filed a challenge against […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates