Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
The Kerala High Court in a case ruled that the advantages of Income tax, 1961 deduction u/s 80(P) were refused because of not furnishing the ITR on the said time. The applicant Muvattupuzha Agricultural Co-Operative Bank Ltd., has furnished the writ petition contesting the assessment order under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act and […]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) of the New Delhi bench for a case ruled that the assessment or reassessment in an investigation concerned with the matter could not be passed without proper approval of the competent authority and quashed it. It was noted that the approval allotted u/s 15D of the Income […]
In the matter of Pilani Industrial Corporation Limited Vs ACIT, heard by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi, the issue is of cash deposits at the time of the demonetization period. The petitioner, Pilani Industrial Corporation Limited, argued against the assessment order of the Assessing Officer (AO) for the treatment of cash deposits amounting […]
The Income Tax Assessment Order, remarking that no order can be passed in the name of a non-existent entity has been quashed by the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ). The issue at hand was whether the assessment made in the name of a company that did not exist at […]
The New Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that payment made overseas for delivering a report on Tariff Change is not FTS and set aside the demand of Tax Deducted at Source ( TDS ) under section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. While framing the assessment, AO […]
The New Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) carried that unless there is proof to show that the obligation has ceased to exist, no addition under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act is there and therefore, deleted the addition made by Assessing Officer (AO). A petition has been filed by Shashi […]
While discovering that the taxpayer has a valid reason to acknowledge the payments for ‘transactional charges’ to be not covered u/s 194J(1)(ba) of the Income Tax Act, the New Delhi ITAT ordered to deletion of the penalty order passed by the CIT(A) u/s 271C. Under Section 194J(1)(ba) of the Income Tax Act, any payment made […]
The matter of Sunil Khaitan vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) is concerned with the taxation of cash deposits incurred at the time of the demonetization period. Sunil Khaitan, the appellant, filed his ITR for the AY 2017-18, reporting a total income of Rs. 40,48,000/-. However, his case was appointed for scrutiny under the Computer Aided Scrutiny […]
The Centre wishes to reconsider the 45-day payment rule for micro, small, and medium enterprises if the industry wants it, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman cited. The Finance Minister cited that when MSMEs need an extended payment duration then they could provide the representations for the acknowledgement in the forthcoming budget in July. The minister in […]
