Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
The Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that the supply of goods to another country’s customer should not be considered a supply of goods or a supply of services. The applicant is involved in two transactions, according to M.P. Ravi Prasad and Kiran T. Reddy, who make up the two-person bench. The first involves […]
The supply of aircraft-type rating training is eligible for GST Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) stated. The two-member bench of M.P. Ravi Prasad and Kiran T. Reddy sees that the supply of aircraft type rating training services to commercial pilots, with the training curriculum authorized by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation for receiving […]
The allegations of claiming the bogus credit could not be the basis for refusing the applications for the refund held by the Delhi High court until the same would be accomplished that the applicant does not obtain the goods or paid for them. The applicant is qualified for the GST ITC refund on the goods […]
If the applicant furnishes the returns then the Karnataka High Court would allow the Superintendent of Central Tax to issue orders for revocation of the cancellation of the GST registration. The cancellation of GST registration was without due opportunity and was dictatorial seen by the single bench of Justice B. M. Shyam Prasad. The applicant […]
The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) furnished an advisory for the assessee wishing to enrol as a ‘One Person Company’ under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. The advisory on 21/03/2023 mentioned that, “As per provision of section 2(62) of The Companies Act, 2013 “One Person Company” is described as a company that […]
28% GST is subjected to be paid on the supply of PVC floor mats for cars, the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled. The floor mats used for four-wheel motor vehicles (cars) supplied via the petitioner are principally for use in motor vehicles, the two-member bench of Amit Kumar Mishra and Milind Kavatkar witnessed. […]
On the service charges, the provision in the law allows the restaurants to impose the GST, as stated by the Finance Ministry. The same indication would arrive as a legality dispute of the services of the service charges would be litigated in Delhi High court. If the restaurants would be qualified for the GST charge […]
The Delhi High Court ruled that under Rule 86 A of the CGST 2017, the restriction of the input tax credit (ITC) cannot be more than one year. The petitioner, M/s Parity Infotech Solutions Pvt. Ltd., complained about the instruction, which was dated March 8, 2012. Special Commissioner-V, Department of Trade and Taxes, issued the […]
The Delhi High Court has commanded a petitioner to reveal the identity of a friend who got a fake GSTIN using his name. The order of revealing the details of his friend has been written by the division bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Amit Mahajan. The petitioner is required to bring the identity […]
