• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC Directs Authority to Issue Circular: Assessees Must Engage Only Qualified GST Consultants

Madras HC: Case Chandrasekaran Vs Assistant Commissioner ST

The Madras High Court has instructed the government tax department to send out a circular encouraging taxpayers to hire only qualified professionals for handling their Goods and Services Tax (GST) matters.

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy mentioned that, “This Court comes across similar instances in several cases, extending ill advice to the clients by the consultants, who are all not qualified persons. Such kind of ill-advice leads to the fact that the clients are not in a position to appear before the Officers concerned with a suitable reply supported by documents, which is purely on the negligence on the part of the consultant.”

Taxpayer/applicant received a Show Cause Notice. The taxpayer submitted an irrelevant response due to the poor advice from the consultant.

Therefore, the Assistant Commissioner passed the impugned order. Also, the taxpayer’s account was frozen by the bank, which resulted in a halt to the taxpayer’s company.

Due to the workload, the poor advice of the unqualified consultant has been given, as they advise many clients, the bench added.

The taxpayer must be provided proper circular for the engagement of a qualified consultant, the bench asked the department.

Read Also: How to Respond to a GST Notice for Dual Jurisdiction (SGST & CGST)

The bench cited that, “This type of wrong advice given by an unqualified person cannot be accepted. The respondent department is directed to issue note/circular to the assessees to engage consultants and get advice from qualified consultants. Otherwise, the assessees file petitions directly through employees or relatives.”

The taxpayer has been given one more chance by the bench for the above, and it set aside the impugned order.

Case TitleChandrasekaran vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Case No.W.P.No.30638 of 2025

W.M.P.Nos.34336, 34338 & 34339 of 2025
For PetitionerM/s.R.Ananthi
For RespondentMs.P.Selvi, Government Advocate (T)
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2025

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates